VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Muhammad Nadeer @ Naheed Khan @ Nadeer v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 July 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1131/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010077402024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./1131/2024o MD.oMUHAMMADoNADEERo@oNAHEEDoKHANo@oNADEERo S/OoABRARoAHMED,o PERMANENToRESIDENToOFoAMROHA,oMOHALLAoDANISHMANDANo AMROHA,oUTTARoPRADESH-244245 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:ANJALIoMONDOL oD/OoUPENDRAoRAIo o R/OoSIMALUGURIo RAILWAYoCOLONY oPS.oSIMALUGURIo DIST.oSIVASAGAR oASSAMo PIN-78568o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oPoDUTTA,oMR.oKoKALITA,MR.oMoHUSSAINo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oMR.oSURAJIToDAS,oAMICUSoCURIAEoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE HONOURABLEoMRS.oJUSTICEoSUSMITAoPHUKANoKHAUND ORDERo

31.07.2024 Page No.# 2/3

¶1Heard learned counsel Mr. P. Dutta for the petitioner Md. Muhammad Nadeer @ Naheed Khan @ Nadeer.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Cr. PC with prayer for bail as he is behind bars for 311 days in connection with Special Pocso Case No. 73/2023 arising out of Simaluguri P. S. Case No. 26/2023 under Sections 376(3)/506 of the IPC read with Section 6 of the Pocso Act.

¶3Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State and learned counsel Mr. S. Das for the respondent No. 2.

¶4The allegation against the petitioner is that he committed sexual assault on the minor victim. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the statements of the victim, her mother and her sister have already been recorded. There is no scope that the petitioner may influence the other witnesses. Petitioner has prayed for bail on the length of detention. It is submitted that the trial has been procrastinated causing infringement on the right to personal liberty of the petitioner.

¶5The Learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the informant have raised objection against the submission of the petitioner.

¶6It is submitted that the victim and her parents have implicated the petitioner.

¶7I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶8I have also scrutinized the Trial Court Records and the deposition of the witnesses.

¶9I have considered the length of detention of the petitioner. I have also considered that the statements of the victim as well as the other witnesses have Page No.# 3/3 already been recorded.

¶10The petitioner has pledged to abide by any stringent conditions if imposed upon him and co-operate with the trial.

¶11Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/- with two local sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

¶12The learned Trial Court may impose conditions to secure the appearance of the petitioner during the trial. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.