VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Didar Mirdha v. The Union of India and 9 Ors

Closed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 April 2024
Bench
Kalyan Rai Suranaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 2193/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 26.04.2024

Heard Mr. S. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. S. Baruah, learned counsel of CGC appearing for respondent no.1; Mr. C. Baruah, learned standing counsel of the NHAI and NHIDCL appearing for respondent nos.2 to 5; Mr. S. Dutta, learned standing counsel of the Revenue Department appearing for respondent nos.6 and 7; Mr. S. Baruah, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for respondent nos.8 to 10.

¶2Alleging receipt of insufficient land acquisition compensation in respect of petitioner's land that was acquired for National Highway, the present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶3It appears from the statements made in the writ petition that the petitioner has not availed the statutory remedy as prescribed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956.

¶4Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the said jurisdictional arbitrator, and to raise issues which have been raised in this writ petition.

¶5Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed without adjudication by Page No.# 4/4 granting liberty as indicated above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010077612024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2193/2024o MD.oDIDARoMIRDHAo S/O-oLATEoEANUSHoMIRDHA,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-oMORANGAON,oBORGANG,o PO-oBORGANG,oP.S.oANDoMOUZA-oBEHALI,o DISTRICT-oBISWANATH,oASSAM. VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo9oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoITSoSECRETARY,o MINISTRYoOFoROADoTRANSPORToANDoHIGHWAYS,o TRANSPORToBHAWAN,o1,oPARLIAMENToSTREET,o NEWoDELHI-o110001. 2:THEoNATIONALoHIGHWAYSoAUTHORITYoOFoINDIA oG5oANDo6 oSECTORo10 oDWARKA o NEWoDELHI-o110075o(REPRESENTEDoBYoITSoCHAIRMAN). 3:THEoREGIONALoMANAGER oNORTHoEASTERNoREGION oTHEoNATIONALoHIGHWAYoAUTHORITYoOFoINDIA oNEDFIoHOUSE oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-o781006. PageoNo.#o2/4 4:THEoNATIONALoHIGHWAYSoANDoINFRASTRUCTUREoDEVELOPMENTo CORPORATIONoLTD.o(NHIDCL) oPARLIAMENToSTREET oNEWoDELHI-o110001o (REPRESENTEDoBYoITSoMANAGINGoDIRECTOR). 5:THEoEXECUTIVEoDIRECTORoCUMoHIGHWAYoADMINISTRATIOR oNHIDCoLTD. oGNBoROAD oAMBARI oGUWAHATI-o781001. 6:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM o REVENUEoANDoDISASTERoMANAGEMENToDEPARTMENT o DISPUR oGUWAHATI-06. 7:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFo ASSAM oREVENUEoANDoD.M.oDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-o06. 8:THEoDEPUTY/oDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER oSONITPUR. 9:THEoDEPUTYo/oDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER oBISWANATH. 10:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICER oBISWANATHoREVENUEoCIRCLE o BISWANATHo Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.