United India Insurance Company Limited v. Musstt Sufiya Begum and 7 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010078422020 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1046/2020o UNITEDoINDIAoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLIMITEDo HAVINGoITSoREGDoOFFICEoATo24,oWHITESoROAD,oCHENNAIoANDo REGIONALoOFFICEoAToGSoROAD,oBHANGAGARH,oGUWAHATI-o781005,oREP.o BYoREGIONALoMANAGER VERSUSo MUSSTToSUFIYAoBEGUMoANDo7oORSo W/O-oLATEoTAZIMoUDDINo@oTAJIM,oR/O-oVILL-oNATANPUR,oP.O-oKALAIN,o P.S-oKATIGORAH,oDIST-oCACHAR,oASSAM 2:MD.oMASUMoAHMED oS/O-oLATEoTAZIMoUDDINo@oTAJIM oR/O-oVILL-oNATANPUR oP.O-oKALAIN oP.S-oKATIGORAH oDIST-oCACHAR oASSAM 3:TAHMINAoBEGUM oD/O-oLATEoTAZIMoUDDINo@oTAJIM oR/O-oVILL-oNATANPUR oP.O-oKALAIN oP.S-oKATIGORAH oDIST-oCACHAR oASSAM 4:ABDULoMALIK oS/O-oLATEoTAZIMoUDDINo@oTAJIM oR/O-oVILL-oNATANPUR oP.O-oKALAIN oP.S-oKATIGORAH PageoNo.#o2/3 oDIST-oCACHAR oASSAM 5:TANZINAoBEGUM oD/O-oLATEoTAZIMoUDDINo@oTAJIM oR/O-oVILL-oNATANPUR oP.O-oKALAIN oP.S-oKATIGORAH oDIST-oCACHAR oASSAM 6:MUSSTToNEKBULAoBIBI oW/O-oLATEoHABIBoALI oR/O-oVILL-oNATANPUR oP.O-oKALAIN oP.S-oKATIGORAH oDIST-oCACHAR oASSAM 7:DULALoSAHA oR/O-oCHANDPUR oKHAYERPUR oAGARTALA oP.S-oAGARTALA oDISToWESToTRIPURA oTRIPURA 8:GOPIKAoSUTRADHAR oS/O-oSRIoGOBINDAoSUTRADHAR oR/O-oVILL-oTONGIBADI oP.S-oDHARMANAGAR oDIST-oNORTHoTRIPURA oTRIPURo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoSoDUTTAo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkRk

20.03.2024o Heard the learned counsel Mrs. M. Choudhury appearing for the applicant/Insurance Company. Also heard Mr. M. Talukdar, learned counsel Page No.# 3/3 representing Opposite Party Nos.1 to 5.

¶2Seen the Office note dated 18.03.2024.

¶3It is stated that Opposite Party No.6 Musstt. Nekbula Bibi had expired on

19.03.2018.

¶4Mr. Talukdar submits that the legal heirs of the deceased respondent are already on record.

¶5Therefore, the name of the Opposite Party No.6 Musstt. Nekbula Bibi should be struck off from the memo of appeal as well as from the title page of the present Interlocutory Application.

¶6Accordingly, the name of Musstt. Nekbula Bibi (Opposite Party No.6) shall be struck off from the memo of appeal as well as the from the title page of the present Interlocutory Application.

¶7The Insurance Company has already deposited 50% of the awarded amount before the Registry of this Court. The Opposite Party Nos.1 to 5 shall be allowed to withdraw the said 50% of the awarded amount without any rider.

¶8Out of the aforesaid 50%, ₹1 lakh each shall be kept fixed deposit in the name of the Opposite Party Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 till they attain majority. The remaining amount may be allowed to be given to the Opposite Party No.1 Musstt. Sufia Begum after proper verification. With the aforesaid direction, the present Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant