Mahendra Daimari and Anr v. The State of Assam and 2 Ors

ORDER

03.05.2024

Heard Mr. N. Barman, learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the opposite party-respondent. Mr. Barman, learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners have submitted that the applicants-petitioners have appeared before the learned trial court on 02.05.2024 in connection with G.R. Case no. 435/2012 and on their appearances, the applicants-petitioners have been allowed to go on bail on execution of a bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- each with one surety of the like amount, in default, jail hajot. In view of the above development, Mr. Barman, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the applicants-petitioners do not want to pursue with the instant interlocutory application. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Barman, learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners, the instant interlocutory application stands dismissed, as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010078792024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Crl.)/376/2024o MAHENDRAoDAIMARIoANDoANR.o S/OoLATEoMONIYAoDAIMARIo R/OoPAKRIBARI,oP.S.oUDALGURI,oDIST.oUDALGURI,oASSAM 2:oSRIoBIRDAWoBASUMATARY oS/OoSRIoCHONIBORoBASUMATARYo R/OoROWTAoCHARIALI oP.S.oROWTA o UDALGURI oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:SRIoBHABAoKANTAoDAS oS.I.o S/OoLT.oDUTIRAMoDASo R/OoMANJAoP.S. oMANJAo DIST.oKARBIoANGLONG oASSAM 3:SMTI.oANIMAoTHAKURIA oW/OoKUUDoCH.oTHAKURIAo R/OoMALIGAON oP.S.oJALUKBARI o DIST.oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oNoBARMANo Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY