VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ravish Kumar v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
2 May 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1151/2024

Judgment

ORDER

03.05.2024

Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner, namely, Ravish Kumar, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Bongaigaon G.R.P.S. Case No.27/2024 under Sections 20(b)(ii)B of NDPS Act. Page No.# 2/3 The matter relates to recovery and seizure of 15.4 Kgs of ganja from the possession of the accused petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody for last 59 days since his arrest on 05.03.2024 and the contraband items recovered from his possession falls under intermediate quantity. Considering the length of detention, prayer for bail may be considered. Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the contraband recovered from his possession falls under intermediate quantity. However, bail may be considered to the petitioner on the ground of length of detention. In view of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two suitable sureties of the like amount out of which one of the surety must be a government employee of Assam, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Bongaigaon. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner:

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge, Bongaigaon without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing Page No.# 3/3 such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010079832024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1151/2024 RAVISH KUMAR S/O SRI VIJAY YADAV, VILL.- GANGIYA WARD NO. 10, P.O.- KHARGI TIRASI, P.S.- GANUAR, DIST.- KHAGARIA, STATE- BIHAR. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.