Musstt. Roop Bhanu v. Mst. Hanufa Begum and Anr

O R D E R

31.05.2024

This is an application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the applicant who is the respondent No.4 in the accompanying Second Appeal bearing RSA No.27/2021 alleging that the appellants who are the opposite party in the instant application are raising construction over the Schedule-B land. It has also been alleged that there is likelihood that the appellants may create third party interest over the Schedule-B land which would be detrimental to the interest of the applicant/respondent.

¶2On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that there is no construction being carried out. However, to resist the flood water coming into the residence, some low lying areas have been filled up without changing the nature of the suit land. The learned counsel for the respondents further submitted that the appellants would not create any third party right or alienate the Schedule-B land.

¶3Taking into account the above, this Court disposes of the instant Interlocutory Application thereby directing that the appellants who are in possession of the suit land shall not raise any construction over the Schedule-B land. Further to that, the appellants shall not also create any third party right over the Schedule-B land.

¶4Be that as it may, this Court however makes it clear that filling up Page No.# 4/4 the Schedule-B land with earth in order to resist flood water can be carried out by the appellants. However no equity can be claimed on the basis thereof.

¶5In view of the above, the instant I.A. stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010080882024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1164/2024o MUSSTT.oROOPoBHANUo D/O-oLATEoJALALoKHAN,oW/O-oSHAHJAHANoALIoAHMED,oR/O-oVILL.-o MAIKUCHI,oMOUZA-oBARPETA,oDIST.-oBARPETA,oASSAM. VERSUSo MST.oHANUFAoBEGUMoANDoANRo W/O-oLATEoAHAMMADoALI,oR/O-oVILL.-oMAIKUCHI,oMOUZA-oBARPETA,o DIST.-oBARPETA,oASSAM. 2:HUMAYUNoKABIR oS/O-oLATEoAHAMMADoALI oR/O-oVILL.-oMAIKUCHI oMOUZA-oBARPETA oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAMo oLinkedoCaseo:oRSA/4/2021 MST.oHANUFAoBEGUMoANDoANR W/O-oLATEoAHAMMADoALI oR/O-oVILL.-oMAIKUCHI oMOUZA-oBARPETA oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAM. 2:oHUMAYUNoKABIR S/O-oLATEoAHAMMADoALI oR/O-oVILL.-oMAIKUCHI oMOUZA-oBARPETA oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAM. Page No.# 2/4 VERSUS MUSSTT. ROOP BHANU D/O- LATE JALAL KHAN AND W/O- SHAHJAHAN ALI AHMED R/O- VILL.- MAIKUCHI MOUZA- BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. Linked Case : RSA/27/2021 MST. HANUFA BEGUM AND ANR W/O- LATE AHAMMAD ALI R/O- VILL.- MAIKUCHI MOUZA- BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. 2: HUMAYUN KABIR S/O- LATE AHAMMAD ALI R/O- VILL.- MAIKUCHI MOUZA- BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. VERSUS MUSSTT. ROOP BHANU D/O- LATE JALAL KHAN W/O- SHAHJAHAN ALI AHMED R/O- VILL.- MAIKUCHI MOUZA- BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. For the applicnat (s) : Mr. P. Kataki, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. S. A. Bakhtiar, Advocate Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH