- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 March 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- WP(C) 3593/2021
Judgment
O R D E R
04.03.2024.
Heard Mr. M.H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Phukan, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 and also heard Ms. D.D. Barman, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent No.4. 2) The petitioner was appointed as Arabic Teacher by the School Managing Committee of 3 No. Bhandara M.E. Madrassa on 30.10.2005 and the said school was recognized under Section 12 of the Assam Elementary (Provincialisation) Act, 1974. According to the petitioner, her appointment was approved by the District Elementary Education Officer (DEEO), Bongaigaon vide order dated
03.10.2007. She imparts lesson of Arabic to the students of the said school. It is contended that the District Scrutiny Committee, Bongaigaon recommended her name for provincialisation of her service as Arabic Teacher along with six other employees of the said school. The name of the petitioner is also reflected in the DISE Code. However, vide impugned order dated 04.02.2021, the service of the petitioner has not been provincialized, while provincialising the other teachers and employees. 3) Section 14 of the Assam Education (Provincialisation of Services of Teachers and Re-Organisation of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 (as amended in 2018), provides for an appeal against the recommendation to the Appellate Authority. 4) As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties and on consent, the Page No.# 3/3 Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 14 of the Act of 2017, within twenty five (25) days from today. On such filing of Appeal, the appellate Authority shall consider the case of the petitioner, by giving her an opportunity of hearing and pass appropriate order(s) within two (2) months, from the date of receipt of the said Appeal.
(5) The Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the above direction and order. No order as to cost.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010081102021 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3593/2021o SHAHIDAoAHMEDo W/OoHASHEMoALIoMONDALo VILLAGEoBHANDARAoNO.o5,oPOoBHANDARAoBAZAAR,oDISTo BONGAIGAON,ASSAM,o783390 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo THROUGHoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oELEMENTARYo EDUCATION,oDISPURoGUWAHATIo06 2:THEoDIRECTORoOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION oASSAMoKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATIo19 3:THEoDISTRICToELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoOFFICER oBONGAIGAON oASSAM 4:THEoDISTRICToSCRUTINYoCOMMITTEE oBONGAIGAONo oREPRESENTDoBYoTHEoCHAIRPERSONoCUMoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oBONGAIGAON oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoMoHoAHMEDo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oGA,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkKARDAKkETE Page No.# 2/3
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.