- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 December 2024
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana, S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 1166/2024
Judgment
ORDER
16.12.2024 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Ms. D. Pegu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A. C. Borbora, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. N. Dey, learned counsel for the respondent.
¶2By filing this Interlocutory Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 6 (six) days beyond the period of limitation in filing the connected writ appeal.
¶3The learned Senior Counsel for the respondent has objected to the prayer made on the ground that the explanation for delay is vague and therefore, the application should not be allowed. Page No.# 3/3
¶3Considering the projection that there was some delay in obtaining the approval from the competent authority, and, taking into consideration that the delay is only for 6 days, this interlocutory application stands allowed. The delay of 6 days beyond the period of limitation in filing the connected writ appeal stands condoned.
¶4Registry shall register the connected writ appeal and as agreed to by both sides, list the same in the admission column on 29.01.2025.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010081102024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1166/2024o THEoFOODoCORPORATIONoOFoINDIAoANDo2oORSo REGIONALoOFFICE,oREPRESENTEDoBYoITSoCHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGINGo DIRECTOR,oBARAKHAMBAoROAD,oNEWoDELHI,oPIN-110006 2:oTHEoGENERALoMANAGERo(REGIONAL) oFOODoCORPORATIONoOFoINDIA oREGIONALoOFFICE oASSAMoREGION oPALTANBAZAR oGUWAHATI oASSAM oPIN-781008 3:oTHEoDIVISIONALoMANAGER oFOODoCORPORATIONoOFoINDIA oDIVISIONALoOFFICE NORTHoLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo78700o VERSUSo M/SoNIToTRADERSo HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToG.C.oROAD,oWAKAFoBUILDING,o TEZPUR,oDIST-oSONITPUR,oASSAM,oPIN-784001,oREPRESENTEDoBYoITSo PROPRIETOR,oSRIoDIGANTAJIToBARUAH,oAGEDoABOUTo55oYEARS,oS/Oo LATEoLAKHIoPRASADoBARUAH,oR/OoG.C.oROAD,oWAKAFoBUILDING,o TEZPUR,oDIST-SONITPUR,oASSAM,oPIN-784001 AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoBoKoSINGH,o AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMRS.oRoBORBORA,oMRoKoKALITA,MS.oNoDEYoo Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS VERSUS M/S NIT TRADERS F ------------ Advocate for : MR B K SINGH Advocate for : appearing for M/S NIT TRADERS F BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.