- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 27 May 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- AB 1053/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 28.05.2024
Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Page No.# 2/3 Prosecutor for the State and Mr. S. Afridi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying for pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Mahammad Ali @ Mastufa, in connection with Special Sessions Case No. 58/2020(arising out of Karimganj P.S. Case No. 196/2020) registered under Section 493/376 IPC r/w Section 4 of POCSO Act. It is submitted by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not available during period of investigation as such, he has been shown as absconder in the charge-sheet. It is also submitted that the petitioner was in Kerela during period of investigation as such, it is not known to him that the case has been instituted against him as a result which, he has been shown as absconder in the charge-sheet. Now, the petitioner is ready to appear before the learned trial court and face the trial. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to recall the W/A and P/A. On the other hand, Mr. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that though summons and bailable warrant was issued to the petitioner but he did not appear before the trial court. Subsequently, NBWA and P/A were issued against the petitioner. Mr. Afridi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is released on bail. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial court within 2(two) weeks from today and in the event of filing any bail application, the learned trial court will consider the matter in accordance with law. Till such appearance of the petitioner before the trial court, the warrant of arrest and P/A issued against him, be kept in abeyance. Page No.# 3/3 The bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010081382024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1053/2024 MAHAMMAD ALI @ MASTUFA SON OF ABDUL JALIL VILLAGE- FATEPUR PT II, POLICE STATION KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:ABDUL HOQUE S/O LATE MABARAK ALI R/O NO. FATEHPUR P.S. KARIMGANJ DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.