- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 9 May 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1194/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 10.05.2024
Heard Mr. N. Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail by the petitioner, namely, Md. Shahed Ali @ Sahed Ali, in connection with Laluk Page No.# 2/3 P.S. Case No. 34/2024 (corresponding to G.R. No. 182/2024) registered under Section 21(b)/29 of NDPS Act, 1985. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody since 15.03.2024. The quantity of suspected heroine recovered from the possession of the present petitioner is intermediate. Considering the length of detention as well as the background of the case, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, Mr. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has produced the case diary and submitted that intermediate suspected heroine was recovered from the possession of the present petitioner. However, FSL report has not been received. He further submits that at this stage, bail may not be considered to the petitioner. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the case diary. Considering the fact as well as the length of detention of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary for the purpose of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Laluk P.S. Case No. 34/2024 (corresponding to G.R. No. 182/2024) registered under Section 21(b)/29 of NDPS Act, 1985, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with two suitable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, North Lakhimpur, Lakhimpur, Assam. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner: Page No.# 3/3
(i) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge, North Lakhimpur, Lakhimpur, Assam, without prior written permission from him/her;
(ii) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010083132024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1194/2024 MD. SHAHED ALI @ SAHED ALI S/O MD. NUR AHMED, RESIDENT OF NO. 2, KARUNABARI, PS LALUK, DIST LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.