VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Purabi Saikia and 8 Ors v. The State of Assam and 10 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 April 2024
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 2270/2024

Judgment

ORDER

01.05.2024 Heard Mr. A. Hassan learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard G. Pegu, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education; Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate; Mr. C. Boruah, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General and Mr. R. Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Finance.

¶2It is submitted that the issue involved in this matter is with regard to grant of pension under the Old Pension Scheme to the petitioners who were Fixed Pay Teachers at different L.P. Schools. As it is submitted at the bar that the issues involved are covered by Judgment of this Court in the case of Purnima Hore and Anr. Vs. State of Assam reported in 2023 SCC Online Gau 1165, the present writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage.

¶3The petitioners No. 1 to 8 were appointed as a Fixed Pay Teachers in different Schools by order dated 08.03.2001 and petitioner No. 9 was appointed as Fixed Pay Teachers at Adi Elengi Satra L.P. School by order dated 13.03.2001 issued by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, North Lakhimpur, namely, respondent No. 7 therein. The petitioners were initially granted a stipend of Rs. 1800/- per month with effect from the date of their joining. In the said appointment orders, the petitioners No. 1 to 5 as required, were deputed to undergo the Basic Training Examination for the year 2005-2006 and petitioners No. 6 to 9 were deputed to under the Basic Training Examination for the year 2006-2007. The petitioners thereafter completed the 6th Months Primary Teachers Training Course Final Examination. It is stated that on 01.03.2008 by separate orders issued by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, the services of the petitioners No. 1 to 5 as Page No.# 6/8 Stipendiary Teachers were normalized with effect from 31.08.2006; by order dated 05.03.2008, the services of the petitioner No. 6 was normalized w.e.f

20.09.2007 and vide order dated 18.03.2008 issued by the respondent No. 7, the services of the petitioners No. 7 to 9 were normalized w.e.f 20.09.2007. It is submitted that the petitioners have been allowed to draw regular scale of pay of Rs. 3130/- to Rs. 6000/- and other Govt. admissible allowances with effect from the said date. It is submitted that the petitioners thereafter were receiving the regular scale of pay along with all revision and pay fixation as payable. It is submitted that the Office of the Accountant General also allotted GPF accounts to the petitioners and also issued the balance sheet. However, the said GPF Accounts were closed in the year 2010 on the ground that they are not entitled to subscribe GPF as they are getting the regular time scale of pay after

01.02.2005. Thereafter, the petitioners were allotted the NPS accounts in the year 2011 and since then the contribution of the petitioners towards NPS have been deducted from their monthly salary.

¶4This Court in the case of Purnima Hore(supra) held that the teachers who come within the fold of Stipendiary Teachers are entitled to the benefit under the Rules of 1969 and they are not covered under the New Defined Contributory Pension Scheme, 2009. It was also held that those teachers would also be entitled to subscribe to the GPF and would also be entitled to all other pensionary benefits to which a Govt. servant of corresponding rank is entitled to. This Court further finds it relevant to refer to paragraph 123(x) whereby a direction was issued to the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as allow such persons to subscribe to the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules,1937 after completing necessary verification in that regard. Sub-Paragraph Page No.# 7/8

(x) of 123 of the judgment in the case of Purnima Hore(supra) is reproduced herein under : "123(x) This Court further is of the opinion that the persons similarly situated to that the writ petitioners coming within the category of Stipendiary Teachers, but who have not been able to approach this Court on account of various reasons need not be deprived of the benefits of pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as to subscribe to the fund in terms with General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937. This Court, therefore, directs the respondent authorities to grant the benefits of pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as to allow such persons to subscribe to the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937 after completing the necessary verification in that regard. The same may be done within a period of 6 (six) months from the date of the instant judgment."

¶5Taking into account the above, this Court also finds that the said judgment would be squarely applicable in the case of the petitioner, however subject to verification to be undertaken by the respondent No. 1.

¶6Accordingly, this Court disposes off the writ petition thereby directing the respondent authorities to verify the documents as regards the appointment of the petitioners as Stipendiary Teachers and thereupon after making necessary verifications, if it is found that the petitioners falls within the ambit of the Stipendiary Teacher and were not granted the benefit of the pension under the Rules of 1969 although the regular scale of pay were given to them, the petitioners should be granted the benefits of the pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 and if not otherwise in contravention of the service and other Rules governing the Service conditions of the petitioners. The same may be done within a period of 120 days (One Hundred Twenty days) from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order alongwith the necessary documents evidencing that the petitioners are Fixed Pay Teachers are submitted to the Page No.# 8/8 respondent No. 1.

¶7While granting the benefits to the petitioner, if so entitled under the Rules of 1969, the amounts which have been paid by the Government in terms of NDCPS, 2009 be deducted while granting the benefits. Accordingly, the respondent authorities while granting the benefits of Old Pension Scheme to the petitioners if found to be entitled shall deduct the said amount so paid by the Government in terms with the NDCPS, 2009.

¶8With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/8 GAHC010085392024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2270/2024o PURABIoSAIKIAoANDo8oORSo W/OoBHOIROBoSAIKIAo R/OoVILL-oNO.o2oMORICHAoPATHARo P.O.oMORICHAoPATHARo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR,oASSAMo PIN-784161 2:oSMTI.oNIRMALAoSONOWAL oW/OoROMENoDUWARAo R/OoVILL-oNO.o1oBAHUPATHERo P.O.oDULIAoPATHER o P.S.oNARAYANPURo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-o-784164 3:oSMTI.oPRATIMAoHAZARIKA oW/OoTHANESWARoSAIKIAo R/OoVILL-oSONAPURo P.O.oSONAPURo DIST.LAKHIMPUR oASSAM o PIN-784160 4:oSMTI.oDIPALIoGOGOI oW/OoALOKJYOTIoBARUAHo R/OoVILL-oWARDoNO.o4oBIHPURIAo P.O.oBIHPURIAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PINoNO.o784161 PageoNo.#o2/8 5:oSMTI.oRUJENAoBEGUM oW/OoMD.oNAJIBoAHMEDo R/OoWARDoNO.o1oBIHPURIAo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBIHPURIAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-784161 6:oSMTI.oRANUoDUTTAoSAIKIA oW/OoGOPALoSAIKIAo R/OoWARDoNO.o4oBIHPURIAo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBIHPURIAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-784161 7:oSMTI.oMINAoKUMARIoBORA oD/OoANANDAoBORAo R/OoVILL-oSANDHAKHUWAo PO.oSANDHAKHUWAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-o787054 8:oSMTI.oBICHITRAoBHUYAN oW/OoMADHABoBARUAHo R/OoVILL-oKHORAoDHUNABARIo P.O.oSANDAKHUWAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-o787054 9:oSMTI.oCHITRAoMAHANTA oW/OoMUKUNDAoNATHoMAHANTAo R/OoWARDoNO.o4oBIHPURIAo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBIHPURIAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-78416o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo10oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM,oDEPARTMENToOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION,oDISPUR,o GUWAHATI-781006 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM PageoNo.#o3/8 oFINANCEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-781006. 3:THEoDIRECTORoOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI-19. 4:THEoACCOUNTANToGENERALo(AoANDoE) oASSAM oMAIDAMGAON oBELTOLA o PIN-781029 5:THEoDIRECTORoOFoPENSION oASSAM oHOUSEFEDoCOMPLEX oDISPUR oGUWAHATIo-781006 6:THEoDISTRICToELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoOFFICER oLAKHIMPUR oP.O.oANDoP.S.oNORTHoLAKHIMPUR oDIST.oNORTHoLAKHIMPUR oASSAM oPIN-787001 7:THEoDEPUTYoINSPECTORoOFoSCHOOLS oNORTHoLAKHIMPUR oP.O.oANDoP.S.oNORTHoLAKHIMPUR oDIST.oLAKHIMPUR PIN-787001 8:THEoTREASURYoOFFICERoLAKHIMPUR oP.O.oANDoP.S.oLAKHIMPUR o DIST.oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-787001 Page No.# 4/8 9:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BIHPURIA P.O. AND P.S. BIHPURIA DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-784161 10:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LAKHIMPUR P.O. AND P.S. LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-787001 11:THE TREASURY OFFICER BIHPURIA SUB-TREASURY P.O. AND P.S. BIHPURIA DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-78416 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. A HASSAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU Page No.# 5/8 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.