- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 July 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2246/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15.07.2024
Heard Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. M. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Water Resource Department as well as Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for releasing of the bill amounting to Rs. 3,46,734/- (Rupees Three Lakh Forty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Four only) to the petitioner after the petitioner has successfully completed the contractual works, which were awarded to the petitioner by the respondent authorities.
¶3The case of the petitioner is that the respondent No. 4, by the work order dated 21.08.2015, allotted the work being earth work in embankment by truck carriage in all kinds of soils excluding sandy/rocky soil free from roots and vegetation and filling in uniform layers not exceeding 22.50 Cm thick including cutting and clearing light jungles and trees upto 50 cm girth ploughing or Page No.# 3/4 roughening or benching the seat dugbelling profiling breaking clods upto 25mm cube dressing as per design section including payment of forest royalty if any etc. (10% deduction will be made from section measurement after completion on account of shrinkage) under the scheme R/S to T/dyke along both banks of Kopili River from Charaihagi to Tuklaitup (L/B), Basundhari to Killing Kopili Junction (L/B) and Chaparmukh to Ahatguri Amsoi P.W.D. Road (R/B) including Anti-erosion measures at different reaches to the petitioner.
¶4It is the specific case of the petitioner that despite successfully completion of the work and the same being certified by the Executive Engineer, Morigaon WR Division, Morigaon, out of the total bill only an amount of Rs.1,70,000/- was paid to the petitioner and the remaining amount of Rs. 3,46,734/- admittedly due to the petitioner has not been paid till date.
¶5It appears from the Annexure-8 to the writ petition that the Executive Engineer, Morigaon WR Division, Morigaon, has certified the dues claimed by the petitioner as outstanding.
¶6In view of the liability statement attached to the Annexure-8 of the writ petition issued by the Executive Engineer, Morigaon WR Division, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed with the direction that the respondent No. 2 be directed to re-verify and thereafter take a decision with regard to whether the amount claimed by the petitioner is as per the records. In the event, the respondent No. 2 comes to a decision that the amount claimed is an admitted amount, the same shall be processed in accordance with the decision of this Court in the case of Tamsher Ali vs. State of Assam and others, reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. Page No.# 4/4
¶7Ordered accordingly.
¶8It is needless to clarify that the entire exercise shall be completed within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
¶9With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010086162023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2246/2023o PRASANTAoNATHo SONoOFoLATEoMANORAMoNATH,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-oKHALIHANARI,o POSToOFFICE-oBAMUNIJAN,o POLICEoSTATION-oRAHA,o DISTRICT-oNAGAON,oASSAM,o PIN-o782425. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,o WATERoRESOURCEoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-o781006. 2:THEoCHIEFoENGINEER oWATERoRESOURCEoDEPARTMENT oCHANDMARI oGUWAHATIo PIN-o781003. 3:THEoSUPERINTENDINGoENGINEER oNAGAONoANDoMARIGAONoWATERoRESOURCEoCIRCLE oRoKoBoROAD oHAIBARGAON oDISTRICT-oNAGAON oPIN-o782001. 4:THEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEER oMARIGAONoWATERoRESOURCEoDIVISION oMARIGAON oDISTRICT-oMARIGAON oPIN-o782105. Page No.# 2/4 5:THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA REJUVENATION 6TH FLOOR CABIN SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN RAFI MARG NEW DELHI-11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEORI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.