Dr Miss Jogmaya Saikia v. Union of India and 5 Ors

ORDER Date : 20/05/2024 Vijay Bishnoi, CJ

Heard Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for the applicant. We have also heard Mr. R..K. D. Choudhury, learned DSGI, appearing for the opposite party no.1 as well as Mr. K. Biswakarma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 and Ms. A. Aier, learned Government Advocate, Nagaland, appearing for the respondent no. 6. Page No.# 3/3 The matter comes upon for consideration of the application with the prayer to condone the delay of 32 days in filing the connected appeal. Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned DSGI was directed to accept notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1. Mr. K. Biswakarma, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 and Ms. A. Aier, learned Government Advocate, Nagaland, has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 6. The respondent no. 5 is a formal respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to allow this application. Hence, the IA(C) No. 1340/2024 stands allowed. Delay of 32 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list before this Court after two weeks for admission. In the meantime, counsel for the applicant is directed to supply copies of the writ appeal along with requisite documents to the counsel for the respondents. List the appeal after two weeks by reflecting the name of the learned counsel for the respondents, in the cause list. IA stands disposed of.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

sukhamay Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010090032024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1340/2024o DRoMISSoJOGMAYAoSAIKIAo D/OoLT.oKAMALAKANTAoSAIKIA,oEX-LECTRER,oNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFo TECHNOLOGY,oSILCHAR,oPRESENTLYoAoR/OoSAIKIAoBHAWAN,oR.K.oROAD,o ITACHALI,oP.O.oNAGAON,oDIST-oNAGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-782001 VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFo EDUCATIONoDEPTT.,oNEWoDELHI-1 2:THEoNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFoTECHNOLOGY oSILCHAR oREP.oBYoITSoDIRECTOR oSILCHAR oASSAM oPIN-788010 3:THEoDEPUTYoREGISTRAR oNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFoTECHNOLOGY oSILCHAR oASSAM oPIN-788010 4:THEoASSTT.oREGISTRAR oNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFoTECHNOLOGY oSILCHAR oASSAM oPIN-788010 5:THEoACCOUNTANToGENERAL oNAGALAND Page No.# 2/3 KOHIMA-797001 6:THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GOVT. OF NAGALAND REP. BY ITS SECY. KOHIMA-79700 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BANIK Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. Linked Case : DR MISS JOGMAYA SAIKIA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS H NEW DELHI-1 ------------ Advocate for : MR. S BANIK Advocate for : appearing for UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS H BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM