- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 27 May 2024
- Bench
- Arun Dev Choudhury
- Case no.
- AB 1182/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 28-05-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the applicants, Page No.# 2/3 namely, 1. Sahid Ahmed, & 2. Tahir Ahmed have prayed for pre arrest bail who are apprehending arrest in connection with Hatigaon PS Case No.53/2024 under sections 420/406/468/341 IPC corresponding to GR Case No.1667/2024. Case diary called for is received and perused the same. It is alleged by the informant that the applicants with a promise to the informant that the accused persons will do something to generate income for the informants, who are unemployed youth and opened bank account in their name. Subsequently the informant could learn that in their name loans were sanctioned for purchase of different vehicles including motor cycle and thus they have been cheated. From the case diary, it is seen that sufficient materials have been collected, suggesting that one Abdullah Ahmed and Monish Chetry are the main kingpin and the petitioners are assisting the two accused. The modus operandi of the aforesaid group is that they target unemployed youth and promise them with income and accordingly open bank accounts in their names with an assurance that income/payment can be made only in bank accounts and subsequently, loans were sanctioned for purchase of motor cycles etc in their name without their knowledge and thereafter those motor cycles are sold in different states like Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland etc. The materials so far collected by the investigating authority further suggests that the petitioners are also assisting the prime accused in commission of the offence. The prime accused namely Page No.# 3/3 Abdullah Ahmed is still at large, though co accused Monish Chetri was arrested. Be that as it may, as the sufficient incriminating materials are there in the case diary, this court is of the view that this is not a fit case for grant of privilege of pre arrest bail. Accordingly the pre arrest bail application stands dismissed. Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010090412024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1182/2024 SAHID AHMED AND ANR. S/O TAJ UDDIN AHMED R/O KHUMTAI BAGAN P.S. MORANHAT DIST. CHARAIDEO, PIN-785670 2: TAHIR AHED S/O TAJ UDDIN AHMED R/O KHUMTAI BAGAN P.S. MORANHAT DIST. CHARAIDEO PIN-78567 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R DEV Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.