VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Tuhin Das and Anr v. Assam Tea Employees Provident Fund Organisation and 6 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
26 May 2024
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 2527/2024

Judgment

ORDER

27.05.2024 Head Mr. S. Dutta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N.C. Das, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. J. Baishya, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1, & 3. 2] The petitioner claims to be a contributory in one Kamini Tea Estate which was located at Hoogrijan in the District of Dibrugarh. Pursuant to the Company Petition being CP No.593/2000 which was filed before the High Court of Calcutta under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Calcutta High Court by order dated 30.01.2002 directed winding up the said company and appointed the Official Liquidator. The Official Liquidator took possession of the registered office of the Kamini Tea Estate situated at Kolkata. Subsequently, claims of the employees provident fund was also settled in respect of the claims raised. On 23.02.2023 the notice in respect of the Kamini Tea Estate was published regarding the selling and transferring of the assets. It is the claim of the writ petitioner that the said notice was issued without any prior notice to the writ petitioner. That apart, he submits that as per Section 456 of the Companies Page No.# 4/5 Act, 1956, the Official Liquidator is required to request the District Magistrate in writing in whose jurisdiction property is situated before the property is taken over for auction. According to the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the property was sold at Rs.4,13,90,369/-. It is submitted that the Tea Estate has been sold at a controllable price disregarding all procedures and Rules and Regulations prescribed under the Companies Act, 1956. 3] Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is before this Court praying for an appropriate direction or order to call for all the relevant records/files/documents pertaining to the sale of the Kamini Tea Estate to the respondent no.6. 4] On earlier occasion this Court by order dated 17.05.2024 had observed that the petitioner has to satisfy as to whether he is a 'person aggrieved'. 5] Mr. N.C. Das, learned Senior Counsel submits that the provident fund authority has already lodged their claim before the official liquidator regarding to the claim of provident fund deem to be paid to the authority concerned. It is also submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the respondnets that the Liquidation proceedings which was pending before the Calcutta High Court in the meantime has been closed. 5] Under such circumstances, this Court is of the view that considering the Page No.# 5/5 prayer made in the writ petition seeking calling for relevant documents pertaining to the Kamini Tea Estate, this Court is not inclined to exercise its jurisdiction under the Article 226 of the Constitution of India at this stage. However, liberty is granted to the writ petitioner to approach the Calcutta High Court seeking redressal against any grievances which the petitioner may have against the liquidation proceedings initiated by the liquidator in respect of Kamini Tea Estate. 6] Writ petition stands closed in terms of the above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010091332024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2527/2024o TUHINoDASoANDoANRo SONoOFoLATEoS.N.oDAS,o EX-DIRECTORoOFoTHEoCOMPANY,o RESIDINGoAToP-569,oLAKEoTERRACEoEXTENSION,o KOLKATA-o700029. 2:oKAMINIoTEAoESTATEoCOMPANYoLIMITED oHAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoATo DIKAREREPURAoBHAWAN o459oLAKEoTERRACE o KOLKATA-o700029o VERSUSo ASSAMoTEAoEMPLOYEESoPROVIDENToFUNDoORGANISATIONoANDo6oORSo HAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToNIDHIoBHAWAN,o LALMATI,oBASISTHA,oGUWAHATI-o781029. 2:SUROJEEToDAS oCOMMISSIONER oASSAMoTEAoEMPLOYEESoPROVIDENToFUNDoORGANIZATION o HAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToNIDHIoBHAWAN o LALMATI oBASISTHA oGUWAHATI-o781029. 3:RECOVERYoOFFICER oASSAMoTEAoEMPLOYEESoPROVIDENToFUNDoORGANIZATION oDIBRUGARHoZONE o HAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToMILANoNAGARo(WEST) Page No.# 2/5 POST OFFICE-C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH- 786003. 4:OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 9 OLD POST OFFICE STREET KOLKATA- 700001. 5:RAJIV JAIN SON OF SRI MAHAVIR PRASAD JAIN RESIDING AT COLE ROAD NEW MARKET DIBRUGARH- 786001. 6:LENGRAI TEA LIMITED HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5/7 BUROSHIBTALA (MAIN) ROAD BUILDING NO. 15 5B KOLKATA- 700038. 7:JAY PRAKASH BERIWAL WORKING FOR GAIN AT LENGRAI TEA LIMITED BUROSHIBTALA (MAIN) ROAD BUILDING NO. 15 5B KOLKATA- 700038 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : SC. P.F. Page No.# 3/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.