- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 25 June 2024
- Bench
- Sanjay Kumar Medhi
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 1465/2019
Judgment
ORDER
26.06.2024 Shri BK Jain, learned counsel for the applicants submits that no relief is sought for against the respondent no. 4 and accordingly his name may be struck off from the array of the parties. Since the other respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 have been served, he submits that the present application may be considered. Page No.# 3/3 Shri Jain, learned counsel, by referring to the averments made in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of the petition has submitted that the applicants were presented by sufficient reasons for not being able to prefer the review on time and a delay of 202 days has occasioned. It is submitted that the aforesaid delay is not because of any negligence or intentional and therefore, the delay is required to be condoned. After hearing the learned counsel and taking into account the settled principles to be followed while adjudicating a petition for condonation of delay namely, to have a pragmatic and justice oriented approach, the delay of 202 day in preferring the connected review petition is condoned and the present application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010091952019 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1465/2019o SMT.oJNANoPRABHAoAGARWALoANDo2oORS.o W/O-oHARINARAYANoAGARWAL,o R/O-oHIJUGURI,oOPPOSITEoNEWoTINSUKIAoRAILWAYoSTATION,oHIJUGURI,o PIN-o786192,oTINSUKIAoTOWN,oP.O.,oP.S.oANDoDIST.-oTINSUKIA,oASSAM. 2:oMISSoNIKITAoAGARWAL oD/O-oLATEoVIVEKoKUMARoAGARWAL o R/O-oHIJUGURI oOPPOSITEoNEWoTINSUKIAoRAILWAYoSTATION oHIJUGURI oPIN-o786192 oTINSUKIAoTOWN oP.O. oP.S.oANDoDIST.-oTINSUKIA oASSAM. 3:oMISSoSUNIDHIoAGARWAL oD/O-oLATEoVIVEKoKUMARoAGARWAL o R/O-oHIJUGURI oOPPOSITEoNEWoTINSUKIAoRAILWAYoSTATION oHIJUGURI oPIN-o786192 oTINSUKIAoTOWN oP.O. oP.S.oANDoDIST.-oTINSUKIA oASSAMo VERSUSo SRIoMANOJoKUMARoDUTTAoANDo3oORSo S/O-oSRIoDIMBESWARoDUTTA,o R/O-oBALUGADAo(VIKASHPUR),oP.O.oSUKHANoPUKHARI,oPIN-o786146,oP.S.o Page No.# 2/3 AND DIST.- TINSUKIA, ASSAM. 2:SRI RANJIT CHETIA S/O- SRI JUGADHAR CHETIA R/O- CHANGALI GAON P.O. AND P.S. KAKOPATHAR PIN- 786152 DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM. 3:THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. DIVISIONAL OFFICE- RONGAGORA ROAD TINSUKIA TOWN PIN- 786125 P.O. P.S. AND DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM. 4:ZENTECH INDIA C/O- UDAYRAM GOVINDRAM OPPOSITE NEW TINSUKIA RAILWAY STATION PIN- 786192 P.O. AND DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K JAIN Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.