- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 20 June 2024
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana
- Case no.
- El.Pet. 3/2021
Judgment
ORDER Date : 21-06-2024 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. However, Dr. P.P. Medhi, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
It appears from the record that the names of earlier set of counsel for the petitioners has been deleted from the cause-list as they have Page No.# 2/2 disengaged themselves in the case. As per office note dated 09.04.2024 the petitioner has not engaged any counsel so far. He is personally not present for arguing as the petitioner-in-person. Accordingly it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this matter. Hence, this matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
J U D G E
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010093272021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : El.Pet./3/2021 SHANKAR PRASAD RAY S/O. LATE AJIT NARAYAN RAY, R/O. A2, SANGRAM NILOY, BARPARA, BONGAOGAON, ASSAM, PIN-783380. VERSUS PHANI BHUSAN CHOUDHURY S/O. LATE RAMESH CH. CHOUDHURY, R/O. BAKHARAPARA, PART-II, WARD NO.23, P.S. AND P.O. BONGAIGAON, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-783380. Advocate for the Petitioner : Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P N GOSWAMI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.