- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 June 2023
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 1184/2023
Judgment
ORDER
05.06.2023
Heard Mr. R.N.D. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicants; Mr. R. Boro, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5; Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the opposite party no. 2; and Mr. C.K.S. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 3, 4 & 6. The connected writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 883/2019 was preferred by three petitioners viz. [i] Sri Hemendra Nath Deka; [ii] Sri Rajendra Nath Deka; and [iii] Sri Karuna Kanta Deka. The instant interlocutory application is preferred by the legal representatives of the petitioner no. 3 viz. Karuna Kanta Deka. It is averred that the three applicants are the legal representatives of the petitioner no. 3 viz. Karuna Kanta Deka who expired on 14.03.2023 and they have preferred the instant interlocutory application seeking substitution of the name of the petitioner by them as under :-
On the death of the petitioner no. 3 viz. Karuna Kanta Deka, his legal heirs,
3[a] Smti Jyotshna Talukdar Aged about 57 years, Wife of Late Karuna Kanta Deka, 3[b] Smti Kriti Deka Sinha Aged about 27 years, Daughter of Late Karuna Kanta Deka 3[c] Sri Manib Ratnam Deka Sinha, Page No.# 5/5 Aged about 26 years, Son of Late Karuna Kanta Deka
All are residents of Village – Uttor Dimoria, P.O. – Dhopguri, P.S. – Khetri, District – Kamrup [M], Assam
The learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the prayer for substitution as the applicants have averred that they are the only surviving legal representatives of the deceased petitioner no. 3, Karuna Kanta Deka. In view of the averments made in the interlocutory application for substitution and considering the fact that there is no objection from the learned counsel for the opposite parties, the instant interlocutory application is allowed. The office to make necessary correction in the cause-title of the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 883/2019 and list the case after a week.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010094472023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1184/2023o ONoTHEoDEATHoOFoKARUNAoKANTAoDEKAoHISoLEGALoHEIRSoSMTIo JYOTSHNAoTALUKDARoANDo2oORS.o W/OoLATEoKARUNAoKANTAoDEKAoR/O-oVILL-oUTTORoDIMORIA,oP.O.o DHOPGURI,oP.S.oKHETRI,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM 2:oSMTIoKRITIoDEKAoSINHA oD/OoLATEoKARUNAoKANTAoDEKAoR/O-oVILL-oUTTORoDIMORIA oP.O.oDHOPGURI oP.S.oKHETRI oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 3:oSRIoMANIBoRATNAMoDEKAoSINHA oSOoLATEoKARUNAoKANTAoDEKAoR/O-oVILL-oUTTORoDIMORIA oP.O.oDHOPGURI oP.S.oKHETRI oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAo VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFoROADo TRANSPORToANDoHIGHWAYS,o1,oPARLIAMENToSTREET,oNEWoDELHI-o 110001 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoSECRETARY oREVENUEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oDISPUR oGHY-6 3:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/5 KAMRUP (M) GHY-1 ASSAM 4:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SADAR) CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THHE NHAI OFFICE OF THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) GHY-1 5:THE PROJECT OFFICER CUM THE NODAL OFFICER NHAI MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT ANND HIGHWAY PROJECT IMPLEMENT UNIT PIU HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HOUSE NO.1 1ST FLOOR DILIP HUJURI PATH SARUMATARIA DISPUR GHY-6 6:THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DC KAMRUP (M) GHY- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R N D SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. Linked Case : WP(C)/883/2019 HEMENDRA NATH DEKA AND 2 ORS. S/O- LT NAGENDRA NATH DEKA R/O- VILL- UTTOR DIMORIA P.O. DHOPGURI P.S. KHETRI DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 2: RAJENDRA NATH DEKA S/O- LT NAGENDRA NATH DEKA R/O- VILL- UTTOR DIMORIA PageoNo.#o3/5 oP.O.oDHOPGURI oP.S.oKHETRI oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM o3:oKARUNAoKANTAoDEKA S/O-oLToNAGENDRAoNATHoDEKA oR/O-oVILL-oUTTORoDIMORIA oP.O.oDHOPGURI oP.S.oKHETRI oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM oVERSUS THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS. REP.oBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA oMINISTRYoOFoROADoTRANSPORToANDoHIGHWAYS o1 oPARLIAMENToSTREET oNEWoDELHI-o110001 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM REP.oBYoSECRETARY oREVENUEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oDISPUR oGHY-6 o3:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER KAMRUPo(M) oGHY-1 oASSAM o4:THEoSUB-DIVISIONALoOFFICERo(SADAR) CUMoCOMPETENToAUTHORITYoUNDERoTHHEoNHAI oOFFICEoOFoTHEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oKAMRUPo(M) oGHY-1 o5:THEoPROJECToOFFICERoCUMoTHEoNODALoOFFICER oNHAI MINISTRYoOFoROADoTRANSPORToANNDoHIGHWAYoPROJECToIMPLEMENTo UNIToPIU oHAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToHOUSEoNO.1 o1SToFLOOR oDILIPoHUJURIoPATH oSARUMATARIA oDISPUR oGHY-6 o6:THEoLANDoACQUISITIONoOFFICER OFFICEoOFoTHEoDC oKAMRUPo(M) Page No.# 4/5 GHY-1 ------------ Advocate for : MR. C P SHARMA Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.