VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Ilias Ali and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
2 June 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 1235/2024

Judgment

ORDER

03.06.2024

¶1Heard R. Begum, learned counsel for the petitioners, Md. Ilias Ali and Md. Rekib uddin Ahmed.

¶2This application has been filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.pc as the petitioners, Md. Ilias Ali and Md. Rekib uddin Ahmed are apprehending arrest in connection with Mangaldoi P. S. Case No. 113/2024 under Sections 147/149/427/326/506/307 of the IPC.

¶3Heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, who has submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioners.

¶4I have perused the Case Diary. Indeed there are incriminating materials against the present petitioners.

¶5The victims have sustained injuries. Victim, Shasanka Deka has sustained grievous injury caused by blunt object on left metacarpal bone and other Injuries whereas the other victim, Jiten Deka has sustained simple injury caused by blunt object.

¶6I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶7The allegations against the petitioners is that, when the informant and his son tried to sell betel nut, the petitioners restrained and attacked them causing grave injuries on the informants' son as well as on her husband.

¶8I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. Investigation has also progressed to a considerable extent. The petitioners have Page No.# 3/3 pledged to co-operate with the remaining part of the investigation.

¶9It appears that custodial interrogation may not be required for further progress of investigation.

¶10Considering all aspects, petition is allowed.

¶11The petitioners are enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/-(Rs. Fifty thousand only) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority under the condition that;

(i) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged;

(ii) the petitioner shall not leave jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission till completion of investigation; and

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the arresting authority within 10

(ten) days.

¶12On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶13Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010105522024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o oLinkedoCaseo:oAB/1235/2024 MD.oILIASoALIoANDoANR. S/OoLT.oAYUBoALIo R/OoWARDoNO.o2 o MANGALDOI o P.S.oMANGALDOIo DIST.oDARRANG oASSAM 2:oMD.oREKIBoUDDINoAHMED S/OoSAMSULoHAQUEo R/OoONDULAJAN oP.S.oDHULLAo P.O.oDHULLA oDARRANG oASSAM oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM REP.oBYoTHEoPP oASSAM o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oMRoPoKATAKI Advocateoforo:oPP oASSAMoappearingoforoTHEoSTATEoOFoASSAM ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE Page No.# 2/3 HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.