- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 May 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- AB 1244/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 17.05.2024
Heard Ms. G. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3
This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Produce, 1973, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, who is apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 15/2024, under Section 498(A)/313/506/294/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tihu, arising out of Tihu P.S. Case No. 83/2022.
It is submitted by Ms. G. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the case has already been Charge-Sheeted against the present accused/petitioner under Sections 498(A)/ 313/506/294/34 IPC showing him as an absconder. However, after the lodging of the F.I.R., the both the accused/petitioner and victim amicably settled the matter and at present, they are living happily as husband and wife. He was not aware about the pendency of this case and for which he could not appear before the I.O. as the police never searched for him during the investigation of the case. However, he is ready and willing to appear before the learned Court below as and when the date is fixed if he is granted with some protection.
In this context, Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has submitted that only summons have been issued against the present accused/petitioner. However, he may be directed to appear before the learned Court below with an appropriate application for bail which may be considered in accordance with law.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for both sides Page No.# 3/3 and also considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has already been compromised, I hereby direct the present accused/ petitioner to appear before the learned Court below on or before the next date fixed with an appropriate application for bail which may be considered in accordance with law.
However, no coercive action shall be taken against the accused/petitioner till 21.05.2024, i.e. the next date fixed by the learned Court below.
In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010094992024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1244/2024 RUPJYOTI SARMA S/O KAYLASH CHANDRA SARMA VILL-NIZ NAMATI P.S. TIHU DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS G DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.