VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Panna Dey v. The Union of India and 3 Ors

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
19 June 2023
Bench
Sanjay Kumar Medhiauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 2954/2018

Judgment

ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard Ms. U. Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS). The matter pertains to correction of date of birth in the Mark-sheet issued by the NIOS on 07.10.2014 wherein the date of birth of the petitioner has been reflected as

11.01.1983. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in June, 1986, due to pecuniary conditions, he had to leave his School, namely the Government Higher Secondary School, Seijosa. However, later on he appeared in the Secondary Examination held in April, 2014 from the NIOS. In the said certificate issued on

07.10.2014, as has been recorded above, his date of birth is stated to be 11.01.1983. The learned counsel has submitted that though an application was made on

30.11.2016 for correction of date of birth, the same was rejected on the ground that no request would be accepted after 3 years from the date of registration. While the requirement of making an application prior to 3 years of registration is not disputed, what has been argued is that the date of birth could be ascertained only on receipt of the Mark-sheet on 07.10.2014 and within 3 years the application for Page No.# 3/4 correction was indeed made. The learned counsel has based the claim of the petitioner upon two documents, the first being a Birth Certificate issued by the Department of Economics and Statistics, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh wherein the date of birth of the petitioner has been stated to be 12.12.1973. The second document is the document referred above namely, the Transfer/School Leaving Certificate issued by the Government Higher Secondary School, Seijosa, Arunachal Pradesh. Ms. Bora, the learned counsel for the NIOS submits that no fault can be attributed with the impugned order dated 18.01.2017 as under the Rules governing, an application for correction of date of birth has to be made within 3 years from the date of registration and in the instant case, the registration was done prior to 3 years from the date of application made on 30.11.2016. She further submits that the date of the Mark-sheet is not relevant and it is only the date of registration from which the period of 3 years is to be counted. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court has however noticed that the entire basis of assailing the action of the respondent-NIOS in reflecting the date of birth of the petitioner as 11.01.1983 are two documents, namely, the Birth Certificate issued by the Government of Arunachal Pradesh and the Transfer/ School Leaving Certificate issued by the Government Higher Secondary School, Seijosa, Arunachal Pradesh. Though the date of birth of the petitioner has been stated as 12.12.1973 in both the documents, what intrigues this Court is that both the documents were procured in the year 2016. While the Birth Certificate issued by the Department of Economics and Statistics, Government of Arunachal Pradesh was issued on 12.09.2016, the School Leaving Certificate by the Government Higher Secondary School, Seijosa, Arunachal Pradesh was issued on 26.07.2016. This Court therefore fails to comprehend as to how the challenge made for correction of date of birth can be on the basis of two documents which are later in point of time. There is no explanation in the writ petition Page No.# 4/4 as to why there is such delay in procuring the certificates from the Department as well as from the earlier school. Under those facts and circumstances, this Court is unable to accede to the prayer made in this writ petition and accordingly the same stands dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010096462018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2954/2018o PANNAoDEYo S/OoDURGENDRAoCHANDRAoDEYo C/OoJYOTIoDASo R/OoKACHARIGAON,oTEZPURo DIST.oSONITPUR,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo3oORS.o THROUGH-o THEoSECRETARY,oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,o MINISTRYoOFoHUMANoRESOURCEoDEVELOPMENToNEWoDELHI. 2:THEoDIRECTOR oNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFoOPENoSCHOOLINGoNEWoDELHI. 3:THEoREGIONALoDIRECTOR oNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFoOPENoSCHOOLINGoREGIONALoCENTRE oGUWAHATIoBUILDINGoOFoPUBLICATIONoBOARD o oASSAM o oBAMUNIMAIDAN oNEARoASSAMoHIGHERoSECONDARYoSCHOOLoCOUNCIL o GUWAHATIo-o781021 oASSAM 4:THEoASSISTANToDIRECTOR oNATIONALoINSTITUTEoOFoOPENoSCHOOLINGoREGIONALoCENTRE o Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI BUILDING OF PUBLICATION BOARD ASSAM BAMUNIMAIDAN NEAR ASSAM HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION COUNCIL GUWAHATI - 781021 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.