VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Mokser Ali v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
8 May 2023
Bench
Ajit Borthakurauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1609/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 08.05.2023 Heard Mr. M Khan, learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. B Sharma, Page No.# 2/3 learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner, namely, Mokser Ali has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No.148/2022 under Sections 363/366/376 of IPC r/w Section 6/17 of POCSo Act r/w Section 9/10/11 (1) of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act r/w Section 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act. The FIR relates to allegation of child marriage and sexual marital assault. It is submitted by Mr. M Khan, learned counsel for the accused petitioner that the present accused petitioner was granted pre-arrest bail by this Court on 03.05.2023 in AB 1381/2023 but as the accused petitioner could not produce the certified copy of the order on

04.05.2023, he was arrested. The order, dated 03.05.2023 passed in AB 1381/2023 whereby the accused petitioner was granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail is hereby extracted herein below (operative portion): "……………….Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest, each of the petitioners, named above, shall be released on pre-arrest bail, in connection with the above noted case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject, of course, to the following conditions:

(i) That the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 7 days, failing which, on and from the 8th day this pre-arrest bail order shall have no force; and

(ii) (ii) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer." In view of above, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above shall be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- ( Thirty Thousand) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Bongaigaon, subject to the following conditions- :

(i) That the accused petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Page No.# 3/3 Officer as and when required; and

(ii) That the accused petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer or the Court. This disposes of the bail application. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010097882023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1609/2023 MOKSER ALI S/O LATE JAMED ALI @ HAMED ALI R/O VILL- NO. 1 DHUPURI, P.S. MANIKPUR, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:BATEN ALI S/O LATE JAMAL UDDIN R/O VILL- NO. 2 DEWTARY PO.O. ALUKHUNDA P.S. MANIKPUR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78339 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.