Nipen Kakoti v. The State of Assam and 2 Ors

ORDER Date : 09-12-2024 Heard Mr. M.J. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Mr. S.R. Baruah, learned State counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3. It is submitted at the Bar that no issue survives to be adjudicated in the matter in view of shifting of campus of district judiciary of Sivasagar therefore, the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. However, disposal of the writ petition as infructuous shall not be a bar to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for appropriate space as Stand Vendor.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010098232023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2604/2023o NIPENoKAKOTIo S/O-oLATEoMEGHNATHoKAKOTI,o R/O-oJAMUNAoROAD,oPIYOLIoPHUKANoNAGARoWARDoNO.o13,o P.O.oANDoP.S.oANDoDISTRICT-oSIVASAGAR,o ASSAMoFORoNECESSARYoINFORMATIONoANDoACTION. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,o REVENUEoDEPTT.,o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI-6. 2:DEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oSIVASAGAR oDIST-oSIVASAGAR oASSAM. 3:THEoADDITIONALoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONERo(REVENUE) oDIST-oSIBSAGAR oASSAMoPOLICEoHQ oULUBARI o GUWAHATI oASSAMo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoJoBARUAH,oMSoMoNEOG,MSoBoMAJUMDERo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oSC,oREVENUE,oGA,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE