Ker Mioox P Ladia v. The State of Assam

ORDER Date : 29-05-2024

Heard Mr. P.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Ker Mioox P Ladia. Page No.# 2/3

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC for short) with a prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 02.05.2024 in connection with Garchuk Police Station Case No. 129/2024 under Sections 420/379/411/413 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short).

¶3Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.

¶4The FIR unfolds that on 21.04.2024, the truck bearing registration No. AS-01-EC-1659 loaded G.L. Corragated sheet JSW Vishwast (0.20 mm) (1) and another PVC empty drum loaded from Beharbari and proceed to Silchar Maruti Hardware for delivery. The loaded items were valued at Rs.21,86,850/- (approximately). When the informant lost communication with the driver, the matter was informed to the Garchuk Police Station suspecting the driver and the staff of the loaded truck to be involved in the disappearance.

¶5It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that during investigation it was unearthed that the aforementioned truck (AS-01-EC-1659) was actually having the registration No. TR-01-AV-1674. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has stated that the petitioner had purchased the stolen goods which have been finally seized in connection with this case. It is further submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner. However, all the articles have been seized in connection with this case.

¶6I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection and I have also scrutinized the Case Diary.

¶7Investigation has progressed to a considerable extent. The articles which Page No.# 3/3 were fraudulently loaded have been seized in connection with this case. The petitioner has pledged to cooperate with the remaining part of investigation.

¶8Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussion, petition is allowed.

¶9Petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M) under the conditions that:

The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged, failing which, bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶10In the above terms and observations, this Bail Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010099502024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1427/2024 KER MIOOX P LADIA S/O LATE DROS LYNGDOH R/O KHLEONGRIANG, P.S. JOWAI DIST. WEST JAINTIA HILLS, STATE- MEGHALAYA, PIN-793150 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, GOVT. OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND