- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 1 May 2024
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana
- Case no.
- WP(C) 3121/2018
Judgment
ORDER Date : 02.05.2024
Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. D. Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the Forest Department, appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 5 to 7.
¶2The case of the petitioners is that they are the legal heirs of Sew Saran Mahili and they have been residing in the land allotted in the name of their said predecessor-in-interest in the year 1952. It is projected that from a RTI reply received from the Public Information Officer, Divisional Forest Office, Nagaon, South Division, Hojai that the names of private respondent nos. 5 to 8 have been recorded in respect of the said land. It is projected that the entry of the names of the private respondents is in violation of the provisions of Schedule Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. As the representation of the petitioners before the respondent authorities have not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
¶3The learned standing counsel for the Forest Department as well as the learned counsel for the private respondents have both opposed the prayers made in this writ petition. However, on a pointed query of the Court as to whether there is any record of the petitioners being heard before the entry of names of the private respondents in respect of their said land, which was allotted in the name of their grandfather (predecessor-in-interest), the learned standing counsel for the Forest Department has submitted that he has not been provided with those documents, if there by any. Page No.# 4/5
¶4As the Court finds that there is nothing on record to show that the petitioners were given an opportunity of being heard before the name of the private respondent nos. 5 to 8 in respect of part of land, which is claimed to be allotted in the name of Sew Saran Mahili, the Court is of the considered opinion that this is a fit case where the Divisional Forest Officer, Nagaon, South Division, Hojai be directed to hear both the petitioners and the respondent nos. 6 to 8 in connection with the representation filed by the petitioners so as to determine the entitlement of the parties to possession of respect of the land measuring 12 bigha covered by Dag no. 175, which is located under Kaki range within Rampur forest village, claimed by the petitioners to be allotted in the name of Sew Saran Mahili (since deceased), who is projected to be the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners.
¶5In order to facilitate the said hearing, it is provided that the recording of the said land in the names of private respondent nos. 5 to 8 shall not stand as a bar for the Divisional Forest Officer, Nagaon, South Division, Hojai (respondent no.3) to hear the rights and entitlement of the parties by giving opportunity of hearing to both sides and pass necessary orders. We also provide that the adjudicatory order which will be passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Nagaon, South Division, Hojai (respondent no.3) would have an overriding effect on and/ or perusal upon the impugned order related of allotment of land in the names of private respondents.
¶6This exercise shall be done by the Divisional Forest Officer, Nagaon, South Division, Hojai (respondent no.3) within a period of 2(two) months from the date of production of the certified copy of the order. As both sides are duly represented, the petitioners and the private respondent nos. 5 to 8 are directed to appear before the respondent no.3 on 27.05.2024. Page No.# 5/5
¶7It is needless to say that final orders, if any, passed by the authority shall be communicated to the parties.
¶8Interim order stands extended till the appearance of the parties before the respondent no.3 and/ or 27.05.2024, whichever is earlier.
¶9This writ petition stands partly allowed to the extent as indicated above.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010099692018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3121/2018o BANESWARoMAHILIoANDoANR.o S/O-oLToRUPAWATIoMAHILI,oVILL-oPURANAoKAKI,oRAMPURoBONGAON,oP.O. PURANAoKAKI,oP.S.oKAKI,oDIST-oHOJAI,oASSAM 2:oSUNESWARoMAHILI oS/O-oLToRUPAWATIoMAHILI oVILL-oPURANAoKAKI oRAMPURoBONGAON oP.O.oPURANAoKAKI oP.S.oKAKI oDIST-oHOJAI oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo7oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,o FORESToANDoENVIRONMENToDEPTT.,oDISPUR,oGHY-6 2:THEoPRINCIPALoCHIEFoCONSERVATORoOFoFOREST oJURIPAR oPANJABARI oGHY-37 3:THEoDIVISIONALoFORESToOFFICER oNAGAON oSOUTHoDIVISION oHOJAI oASSAM oPIN-782435 4:THEoRANGEoFORESToOFFICER oKAKIoRANGE oKAKIoDISTRICT Page No.# 2/5 HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782446 5:RAM ABATH CHAUHAN S/O- GANESH CHAUHAN VILL- RAMPUR BONGAON P.O. PURANA KAKI P.S. KAKI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782446 6:RAJKUMAR CHAUHAN S/O- RAM SANKAR CHAUHAN VILL- RAMPUR BONGAON P.O. PURANA KAKI P.S. KAKI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782446 7:RAJENDRA CHAUHAN S/O- RAM SANKAR CHAUHAN VILL- RAMPUR BONGAON P.O. PURANA KAKI P.S. KAKI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782446 8:SMTI. SARASWATI MAHILI W/O- SRI JAGARU MAHILI R/O- VILL- AZARBARI P.O. AZARBARI P.S. KAKI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN-78244 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST BEFORE Page No.# 3/5 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.