VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Sujit Dey v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
10 June 2024
Bench
Arun Dev Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
FA(OS) 1449/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010102042024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./1449/2024 SUJIToDEY S/OoSRIoSANJAYoDEYo@oSANJOYoDEYo R/OoTEOKGHATo(AIDEOBARI oBAGICHAoGAON) oP.S.oSONARI o DIST.oCHARAIDEO oASSAM oPIN-o785690 oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM TOoBEoREP.oBYoTHEoPP oASSAM o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oMR.oAoAoRoKARIM Advocateoforo:oPP oASSAMoappearingoforoTHEoSTATEoOFoASSAM ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE THEkHON'BLEkMRkJUSTICEkARUNkDEVkCHOUDHURY OkRkDkEkR o Page No.# 2/3

11.06.2024 Heard Mr. AAR Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying for granting regular bail to the petitioner, Sujit Dey, who was arrested on 04.05.2024 in connection with Sapekhati PS case No. 11/2024 under Section 121/121A/387 IPC read with Section 10/13/39/40 UA(P) Act, 1967 corresponding to GR No. 119/2024. Perused the case diary. It is seen from the case diary that the petitioner has already thoroughly been interrogated by the Investigating Officer. Also perused the statement of the individual witnesses. From the material so far collected it is suggestive that the petitioner paid some amount under threat to the extremists. Considering the period of detention and period of detention, this Court is of the opinion that no further custodial interrogation/detention of the petitioner is required. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Charaideo with the following conditions.

(1) The petitioner shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case,

(2) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer,

(3) The petitioner shall appear before the I/O on each and every date as and when called for. Page No.# 3/3 Bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.