- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 April 2024
- Bench
- Soumitra Saikia
- Case no.
- AB 1715/2023
Judgment
ORDER
09.04.2024
Heard Ms. P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Page No.# 2/2 It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, that the charge-sheet has been filed vide Charge-Sheet No.1078/2023 dated 31.12.2023. In view of the above, the Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of. The petitioner is permitted to appear before the competent Court before which the charge-sheet has been filed. Since there is an interim protection granted earlier to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 22.08.2023, the same shall continue for a further period of 10 (ten) days by which time the petitioner shall appear before the competent authority and pray for regular bail. While considering the case of the petitioner for bail, the competent Court shall take into consideration the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Siddharth vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr., reported in (2022) 1 SCC 676. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010100862023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1715/2023 IKRAMUL HUSSAIN S/O MD. OSMAN ALI R/O VILL- MAHARGURI P.S. JURIA DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM PH. NO. 9864044267 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.