- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 July 2024
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 2075/2024
Judgment
ORDER
31.07.2024
¶1Heard Mr. S. Pegu, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A.G. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.
¶2The learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for striking out the names of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in this Interlocutory Application as the respondent No. 1 is the only contesting respondent in this case.
¶3The prayer is allowed.
¶4The names of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are struck out from this Interlocutory Application.
¶5This application under the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for condoning the delay of 188 days in preferring the connected appeal by which the applicant intends to impugn the judgment and order dated Page No.# 3/3
13.07.2023 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 1, Kamrup, Guwahati in MAC Case No. 2523/2017.
¶6The applicant has explained the cause of the delay in paragraph Nos. 3 and 4 of the condonation of delay application.
¶7The learned counsel for the respondent No. 1/claimant submits that she has no objection if the delay in preferring the connected MAC Appeal is condoned by this Court.
¶8Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 as well as considering the grounds shown in the application in paragraph Nos. 3 and 4 of the condonation of delay application, the delay of 188 days in preferring the connected MAC Appeal is hereby condoned.
¶9This Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of.
¶10The Registry to register the connected MAC Appeal and list it again after a week.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010100942024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2075/2024o THEoRELIANCEoGENERALoINSURANCEoCO.oLTD.o HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoATo19,oRELAINCEoCENTRE,oWALCHANDo HIRACHANDoMARG,oBALLARDoESTATE,oMUMBAIo400001oANDo CORPORATEoOFFICEoATo570,oRECTIFIERoHOUSE,oNAGAUMoCROSS,oNEXTo TOoROYALoINDUSTRIALoESTATE,oWADALAo(W),oMUMBAIo400031oANDoONEo OFoTHEoBRANCHoOFFICESoAToPRAGoPLAZA,o5THoFLOORoG.S.oROAD,o BHANGAGARHoGUWAHATI-o781005. VERSUSo BIRAJoBASUMATARYoANDo3oORS.o S/OoLATEoUZIRoBASUMATARY,o VILL.-oBOGIJULIoPATHAR,oP.O.-oBEDETI,oP.S.-oBEHALI,oDIST.-oBISWANATH,o ASSAM,oPIN-o784179. 2:RUDRAoBAHADURoCHETRY oS/OoLATEoNORDHAJoCHETRY o VILL.-oRAJGARH oP.O.-oNANKEYoPATGAON oBALIPARA oDIST.-oSONITPUR oASSAM oPIN-o784101. 3:ICICIoLOMBARDoGENERALoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLIMITED o305 306oKAMAKHYAoTOWERS oM.S.S.oPATH oCHRISTIANBASTI oGUWAHATI-o781005. Page No.# 2/3 4:JYOTISH PRASAD BORUAH S/O LATE SABHARAM BORUAH R/O NALKATA P.O.- BAGALIJAN DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN- 787031 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A J SAIKIA, MR. S. PEGU,M CHETIA Advocate for the Respondent : FOR CAVEATOR, A G CHOUDHURY In MACApp. Case No. 5661/2014 (Filing Number) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.