- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 10 June 2024
- Bench
- Arun Dev Choudhury
- Case no.
- AB 1327/2024
Judgment
O R D E R
¶1106. 2024 Heard Mr. M Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. By this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, namely, Md. Mufassil Ali @ Mufsil Ali is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Bakalia PS case No. 49/2023 under Section 379/411/34 IPC. Page No.# 2/2 Case diary produced is perused. The material so far collected by the I/O suggest that the present petitioner is involved in stealing many motor cycles and the material also suggests that under his direction and supervision a group is involved in stealing motor cycle, car etc. Considering above and the stage of investigation, this court is of the view that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner in the present case and accordingly, the petitioner is not entitled for privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed. Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010101622024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1327/2024 MD. MUFASSIL ALI @ MUFSIL ALI S/O ELIAS ALI @ ELAS ALI, VILL AND P.O.-SAMARALI BAZAR, P.S.- MURAJHAR, DIST-HOJAI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.