VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mizanur Ali Mandal @ Mizanur Mondol v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
19 June 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 1328/2024

Judgment

ORDER

20.06.2024 Heard Mr M R Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mizanur Ali Mandal @ Mizanur Mondol, who has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for pre-arrest bail, as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Dhubri Golakganj PS Case No. 51/2024, corresponding to GR Case No. 277/2024, registered under Sections 457/376/354/506/325/392/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶3Heard Mr B Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3

¶4The FIR unfolds that about two months back, at around 10 pm, the petitioner went into the victim's house and committed rape on her. When the victim went to the nearby Police Station to lodge the FIR, Moksed Ali Mondal brought her back from the Police Station with a promise to arrange a village meeting, but no village meeting was held. Further, the accused on 10.03.2024, at about 07:00 pm, threatened the victim to kill her husband and also the accused snatched away Rs. 50,000/- from the victim's husband and assaulted him and attempted to commit his murder.

¶5I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶6I have also scrutinized the Case Diary.

¶6I have considered the submission that the FIR reveals that the incident occurred 2(two) months prior to the lodgement of the FIR. The statements of the witnesses have been taken into consideration.

¶7It appears that anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioner.

¶9Considering the Case Diary and considering all aspects, petition is allowed. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/-, with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, under the conditions that:-

i) the petitioner shall appear before the IO within 7 (seven) days from today and cooperate with the investigation, and Page No.# 3/3

ii) the petitioner shall not exercise threats to the witnesses. On breach of any of the bail conditions, the bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶10Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶11Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010101762024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1328/2024 MIZANUR ALI MANDAL @ MIZANUR MONDOL S/O SAJAHAN ALI MONDAL @ SAHAJAHN MONDOL, VILL- PASCHIM KANURI PT-II, P.O.-LAKHIMARI, P.S.-GOLAKGANJ, DIST-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783334 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.