Mahmudur Rahman Barbhuya and Anr v. The State of Assam

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010103242024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1342/2024 MAHMUDUR RAHMAN BARBHUYA AND ANR. NOIM UDDIN BARBHUYA R/O DAKSHIN MOHANPUR P.S. SONAI, CACHAR. 2: SAKIB AHMED LASKAR S/O ALI HUSSAIN LASKAR VILL-SONAI TOWN WARD NO. 6

P.S. SONAI DIST. CACHA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR MINTU SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

:: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R

14.06.2024 Heard Ms. R. Dutta, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Page No.# 2/2

¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the CrPC in respect of Satgaon P.S. Case No.72/2024 registered under Sections 341/358/406/420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3Pursuant to an interim bail granted by this Court on 27.05.2024, the petitioners, namely- (1) Mahmudur Rahman Barbhuya and (2) Sakib Ahmed Laskar have appeared before the police investigating officer and got their statements recorded. It appears from the case diary that the petitioners have been co-operating with the police investigation.

¶4Since the petitioners have been co-operating with the police investigation, they do not deserve to be detained in custody. Accordingly, their pre-arrest bail is allowed. Interim bail granted to them is made absolute. The application for bail is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant