VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Tamez Uddin and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
17 May 2023
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Crl.) 389/2023

Judgment

ORDER

17.05.2023 Heard Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. PP for the State.

¶2This interlocutory application filed by the applicants, namely, 1. Tamez Uddin, 2. Mazim Uddin @ Nazim Uddin and 3. Sahidul Islam and 4. Arfan Ali praying for correction in the order dated 09.05.2023 passed in A.B. No. 1101/2023.

¶3The applicants herein as the petitioners filed the A.B No. 1101/2023 and this Court upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties had passed the order dated 09.05.2023 granting interim bail to the petitioners. However, at Para-2 of the said order, inadvertently the name of the petitioner/applicant No 4 was omitted. Accordingly, this interlocutory application has been filed praying for correction in the order dated 09.05.2023 passed in A.B No. 1101/2023.

¶4Accordingly, it is provided that the benefit of the order dated 09.05.2023 will also be applicable to the applicant No. 4 namely, Arfan Ali.

¶5In the event of his arrest, the petitioner/applicant No. 4 shall be released upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) only with two local sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject, of course, to the following conditions:

(i) That the applicant No. 4 shall appear before the Investigating Officer within Page No.# 4/4 10 days from today;

(ii) That the applicant No. 4 shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner;

(iii) That the applicant No. 4 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and

(iv) That the applicant No. 4 shall not move out the jurisdiction without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer of the case.

¶6In the event, the applicant No. 4 is found to have violated any of the above conditions or is found to be involved in other offences, the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to apply for recall/cancellation of the interim bail granted to the applicant No. 4.

¶7In view of the above, the interlocutory application stands disposed of. This order today passed in I.A (Crl.) No. 389/2023 shall be read along with order dated 09.05.2023 passed in A.B. No. 1101/2023. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010103562023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Crl.)/389/2023o TAMEZoUDDINoANDo3oORSo S/O-oTAIBARoTALUKDAR,oR/O-oVILL-oMERAMARoGAON,,oP.S.o GOBARDHANA,oDIST.-oBAKSA,oASSAM 2:oMAZIMoUDDINo@oNAZIMoUDDIN oS/O-oNURULoHOQUE oR/O-oVILL-oMERAMARoGAON oP.S.oGOBARDHANA oDIST.-oBAKSA oASSAM 3:oSAHIDULoISLAM oS/O-oSUKUARoMAHMUD oR/O-oVILL-oMERAMARoGAON oP.S.oGOBARDHANA oDIST.-oBAKSA oASSAM 4:oARFANoALI oS/O-oHANIFoALI oR/O-oVILL-oBILASIPARA oP.S.oBARPETAoROAD oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Linked Case : AB/1101/2023 TAMEZ UDDIN AND 3 ORS S/O- TAIBAR TALUKDAR R/O- VILL- MERAMAR GAON P.S. GOBARDHANA DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM 2: MAZIM UDDIN @ NAZIM UDDIN S/O- NURUL HOQUE R/O- VILL- MERAMAR GAON P.S. GOBARDHANA DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM 3: SAHIDUL ISLAM S/O- SUKUAR MAHMUD R/O- VILL- MERAMAR GAON P.S. GOBARDHANA DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM 4: ARFAN ALI S/O- HANIF ALI R/O- VILL- BILASIPARA P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P. ASSAM ------------ Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for : MD. I HUSSAIN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.