Fayzal Hoque v. Smti. Suranjana Senapati, Acs

ORDER Date : 13.06.2024

Mr. M. R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, has apprised this Court that the respondent authorities in pursuance to the directions passed by this Court vide order, dated 02.11.2022, in WP(c)4624/2021, has passed an order, dated 20.07.2023, rejecting the appeal as preferred by the petitioner in the matter.

Mr. Khandakar, learned counsel, has submitted that the respondent authorities while disposing of the said appeal as preferred by the petitioner, Page No.# 2/2 herein, had not considered the matter in the manner, this Court had so required.

In view of the fact that the appeal which was directed to be considered by this Court, has since been considered and disposed of by the said order, dated

20.07.2023, this Court finds that there is no willful and deliberate violation of the directions passed by this Court vide order, dated 02.11.2022, in WP(c)4624/2021.

Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to present a challenge to the said order, dated

20.07.2023, by filing an appropriate application, if so advised.

Mr. Bedanta Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondent, is present.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010103742023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/294/2023 FAYZAL HOQUE S/O LT. MASAR UDDIN SK, VILL-KISMAT HASDAHA PT-I, P.O.- KACHARIGHAT, P.S.-DHUBRI, DIST-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783334 VERSUS SMTI. SURANJANA SENAPATI, ACS DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR