VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Tapan Paul and 19 Ors v. The Union of India and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
18 May 2023
Bench
Manish Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 2701/2023

Judgment

ORDER

18.05.2023

Heard Mr. S. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for the respondent nos. 1 -3.

¶2The petitioners who have claimed that they have been running their shops for more than 50 years at a market named 'Paglasthan Daily Market', operated under the aegis of Bongaigaon Municipal Board, were earlier with served a show cause notice on 01.03.2023 by the respondent no. 3 under sub-section [1] and clause [b][ii] of sub-section [2] of Section 4 of the Public Premises [Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants] Act, 1971 to show cause on or Page No.# 6/9 before 14.03.2023 as to why an order of eviction should not be made against them. The petitioners claimed that the show cause notices were served upon them only after

14.03.2023. They had raised a dispute that the plot of land wherefrom they were running their shops, was under Bongaigaon Municipal Board. With such projections, the petitioners had earlier approached this Court by way of a writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023.

¶3When the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023 came up for consideration on

03.04.2023, this Court after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, disposed of the writ petition by an order of even date. The operative part of the order dated 03.04.2023 reads as under :-

¶6With the consent of the parties, the petitioners are directed to approach the respondent no. 3 on 19.04.2023, with regard to the Show-Cause-Notice dated 01.03.2023. The respondent no. 3 shall also communicate with the respondent no. 4, with regard to whether the respondent no.4 claims any right, title and interest over the land, which is used by the petitioners as Paglasthan Daily Market. In the event, the respondent no. 4 claim any right, title over the said Paglasthan Daily Market, the respondent no. 4 shall produce documents in support of their claim. The respondent no. 3 while making a decision shall also reflect the land documents in favour of the Railways. The respondent no. 3 shall thereafter take a decision and communicate his decision to the petitioners. Till a decision is taken by the respondent no. 3, status quo as on today, shall be maintained.

¶4After disposal of the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023 by the order dated

03.04.2023, the petitioners have once again approached this Court by this writ petition with the grievance that they have been served eviction orders in Form-B dated 04.05.2023 under sub-section [1] of Section 5 of the Public Premises [Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants] Act, 1971 whereby they have been asked by the respondent no. 3 to vacate their respective premises within 15 [fifteen] days from the date of publication of the said order.

¶5Mr. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the order dated

04.05.2023 has been passed by the respondent no. 3 without following the directions Page No.# 7/9 contained in the order dated 03.04.2023 [supra]. The eviction orders do not reflect that the respondent no. 3 had considered the documents as regards the plot of land in the order dated 04.05.2023. There is no reflection in the order to the effect that there was effective consultation between Bongaigaon Municipal Board and the respondent Railway authorities as regards the right, title and interest over the plot of land. It is his submission that the petitioners have been running their shops at a plot of land known as Paglasthan Daily Market since about 50 years. As there is a dispute as regards the ownership of the plot of land, the respondent Railway authorities should have established their title prior to passing of the eviction orders which, he has contended, was evidently not done in the proceedings held before the respondent no. 3.

¶6Mr. Gogoi, learned CGC appearing for the respondent nos. 1 - 3 has submitted that subsequent to the order dated 03.04.2023, letters, dated 11.04.2023 & dated 12.05.2023, were sent to the Bongaigaon Municipal Board asking the Board authorities as to whether the Bongaigaon Municipal Board claims any right, title and interest over the plot of land which is being used by the petitioners as Paglasthan Daily Market and in the event it claims any right, title and interest, the Bongaigaon Municipal Board would require to produce documents, if any, in support of their claims on the said plot of land in respect of which notices dated

01.03.2023 were served upon the petitioners under the Public Premises [Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants] Act, 1971. It is submitted by Mr. Gogoi that despite receipt of the afore-mentioned letters, no communication has been received from the Bongaigaon Municipal Board till date.

¶7Taking note of the direction contained in the order dated 03.04.2023 and having understood its purport, the respondent no. 3, in the meantime, has passed office orders, all dated 17.05.2023, addressed to the petitioners herein and the petitioners in the previous writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023, whereby the Eviction Notices dated 04.05.2023 have been kept in abeyance till a decision is taken by the Railway authority as per the direction contained in the order dated 03.04.2023 passed in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023. The office orders, all similarly worded, have further mentioned that the decision taken by the Railway authority would be communicated to the petitioners in terms of the directions of the Page No.# 8/9 Court.

¶8From the case papers annexed to the writ petition, it has emerged that the Bongaigaon Municipal Board has, in the meantime, issued a Tender Notice on 10.04.2023 inviting tenders for settlement of a market named 'Paglasthan Daily Market' with definite boundaries mentioned therein, for the period : 2023-2024. From the publication of the Tender Notice for settlement of Paglasthan Daily Market, it can be inferred that the Bongaigaon Municipal Board might have some claim in respect of the plot of land wherefrom the market named Paglasthan Daily Market is being operated. From the office orders dated 17.05.2023, it transpires that the Bongaigaon Municipal Board has not yet responded to the letters sent by the Railway authorities on 11.04.2023 and 12.05.2023. The eviction orders dated 04.05.2023 do not reflect that the Railway authorities had produced any land documents in its favour before the respondent no. 3 in the proceedings and the respondent no. 3 had proceeded with the matter by extracting a purported admission from the petitioners that the land in question belonged to the Railways, which fact is vehemently disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶9Mr. Gogoi has fairly submitted that from the orders dated 04.05.2023, it does not appear that the directions made in the order dated 03.04.2022 passed in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023 is followed in letter and spirit. Given an opportunity, the directions made in the order dated 04.05.2023 would be followed in letter and spirit in the proceedings before the respondent no. 3.

¶10In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties in the afore-stated manner and after perusal of the materials placed on record, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of at the motion stage itself in the line of the submissions made by the learned Central Government Counsel, by allowing the respondent Railway authorities to proceed with the matter afresh by following firstly, the provisions of the Public Premises [Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants] Act, 1971 and secondly, the directions made in the order dated 03.04.2023 passed in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1947/2023 in letter and spirit. Taking note of the submissions made by the learned Central Page No.# 9/9 Government Counsel, it is directed that the respondent authorities shall proceed with the proceedings afresh by recalling the evection orders dated 04.05.2023 and in the proceedings, the petitioners be given adequate opportunities to represent their case. In the proceedings, the respondent no. 3 shall also look into the land documents regarding the ownership of the plot of land under reference.

¶11This order disposes of the writ petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/9 GAHC010104382023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2701/2023o TAPANoPAULoANDo19oORSo S/OoRAKHALoCHoPAULo 4527,oCOLLEGEoROADo,oWARDoNO.o15,o NATUNoPARA,oDOLAIGAON,oBONGAIGAON,o ASSAM-o783380 2:oNANIoGOPALoDEY oC/OoBHUBANoMOHANoDEYo SALBARI oBONGAIGAON o ASSAM-783380 3:oPRABHAToCH.oDUTTA oS/OoMUDIRAoCHoDUTTAo ADDRESS-oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON o SUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON o DIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 4:oMOTILALoSAH oVILL/TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON o SUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON o DIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) PageoNo.#o2/9 5:oKRISHNAoSAH oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 6:oSUBRATAoDASoGUPTA oC/O-oTILAKoDASo JAYoPRAKASHoSINGHo ADDRESS-oVILL/TOWN-40oDOLAIGAON oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 7:oLALANoSHAH oS/O-oLT.oPANLALoSAHo ADDRESSo-oVILL.o/oTOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON o SUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON o DIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 8:oSAMIRoPODDAR oC/OoRAJESHoKUMARoSAHo ADDRESS-oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON o SUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON o DIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 9:oSANKARoGHOSH oS/O-oLToPHANIoCHANDRAoGHOSH o1536 oCHAPAGURIoROAD oNEARoLEELAoGASoAGENCY oNORTHoBONGAIGAON oBONGAIGAON oBONGAIGAON oASSAMo-o783380 PageoNo.#o3/9 10:oRAMoNATHoSAH oS/OoRUDALoSAHo ADDRESS-oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.-oBONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 11:oSWAPANoDAS oVILL/TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN-BONGAIGAON o DIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 12:oMANGALoSAH oS/O-oJAGARNATHoSAHo SIO-oJAGARNATHoSAH oGRAM-oDUMARSAN oPOSToDUMARSANo.oBANGRA oDUMARSAN.oSARAN oBIHARo-o841410 13:oSATYAoNARAYANoDAS oS/OoLT.oSANKARoDASo ADDRESS-oVIL/TOWN-52oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.I oP.S.BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.oBONGAIGAON oDIST-oBONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 14:oASHOKoMANDAL oS/OoRAMoPRASADoMANDALo ADDRESS-oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.oBONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 15:oLALoBABUoSAH oVILL./TOWN-oRAILWAYoNEWoCOLONY oP.S.oBONGAIGAON PageoNo.#o4/9 oDIST-oBONGAIGAON oASSAMo-o783380 16:oDILIPoKR.SAH oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 17:oSURESHoRABIoDAS oS/O-oJoRABIoDASo ADDRESS-oVILL/TOWNoBHAKARIBHITAoWARDoNO.o19 oP.S.oBONGAIGAON oSUSoDIVN.oBONGAIGAON oDISToBONGAIGACH oASSAN-783380 18:oRAJAToCHATTERJEE oS/OoSHYAMoPADUoCHATTERJEEo ADDRESS-oVILL/TOWN-52oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.oIII oP.S.o-oBONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.o-oBONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 19:oNARAYANoCH.oDAS oVILL./TOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.-BONGAIGAON o(ASSAM) 20:oMANTOOoSAH oS/OoCHAHILAoSAHo ADDRESSo-oVILL.o/oTOWN-53oBONGAIGAONoTOWN oW.NO.IV oP.S.-BONGAIGAON oSUB-DIVN.-BONGAIGAON oDIST.-oBONGAIGAON o(ASSAMo VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo3oORSo Page No.# 5/9 REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI -11, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI - 11 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE ESTATE OFFICER N.F. RAILWAY RANGIA ASSAM 4:THE BONGAIGAON MUNICIPAL BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN NEAR DC OFFICE WARD NO-02 BONGAIGAON-783380 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.