- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 June 2024
- Bench
- Soumitra Saikia
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2752/2023
Judgment
ORDER
12.06.2024 Heard Mr. S.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Goswami, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the fact that for works executed by supplying various items to the respondent No. 4, the bills raised for the supplies undertaken have not been released. Notice in the matter was issued on 19.05.2023. Subsequently, an affidavit has been filed by the Special Superintendent of Police at Addl. Director General of Police Assam wherein there is an averment made that total amount of Rs. 38,33,828/- (Rupees Thirty Eight Lakh Thirty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Eight Only) is pending in respect of the writ petitioner for which the same is being processed under the current financial year. The affidavit also makes an averment that an amount of Rs. 34,94,114/- (Rupees Thirty Four Lakh Ninety Four Thousand One hundred Fourteen Four only) have been paid to the writ petitioner against the total bills received amounting to Rs. 73,27,942/- (Rupees Seventy Three Lakh Twenty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Two Only). The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of such categorical averment and an admission by the respondent authority that the balance amount is required to be paid, a direction be issued to the respondents to release the same amount at the earliest. Page No.# 4/4 Taking into consideration the submissions made by the rival counsel and also specific averment made in the affidavit in opposition filed by the respondent No. 4, this writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondent more particularly respondent No. 4 to process the bills with regard to the outstanding amount required to be paid to the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 38,33,828/-(Rupees Thirty Eight Lakh Thirty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Eight Only) and the same be released expeditiously without further delay. The entire exercise be completed within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010105172023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2752/2023o M/SoUTSHAVoCOMMERCIALo REPRESENTEDoBYoITSoPROPRIETORoSRIoAJAYoKUMARoSINGH,oSONoOFo LATEoRAMoCHANDRAoSINGH,oRESIDENToOFoA.P.R.O.oCOLONY,oULUBARI,o B.K.oKAKATIoROAD,oP.O.oULUBARI,oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR,oDIST.oKAMRUP(M), ASSAM,oPIN-o781007. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo6oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,oHOMEoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,oP.O.o SACHIVALAYA,oDIST.oKAMRUP(M),oASSAM,oPIN-o781006. 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oFINANCEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oASSAMoSACHIVALAYA oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781006. 3:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oP.O.oLACHITNAGAR oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781007. 4:THEoADDITIONALoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE PageoNo.#o2/4 oC.I.D. oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oP.O.oULUBARI oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781007. 5:THEoASSISTANToINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICEo(A) oASSAM oASSAMoPOLICEoHEADoQUARTERS oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oP.O.oLACHITNAGAR oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781007. 6:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oC.I.D. oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oP.O.oULUBARI oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781007. 7:THEoDEPUTYoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oCID oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oOFFICEoOFoTHEoADDITIONALoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oC.I.D. oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oP.O.oULUBARI oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781007o Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K SINHA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.