- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 June 2024
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- AB 1376/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 18-06-2024
¶1Heard Mr. S. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor who has produced the case diary of Mancachar PS Case No. 111/2024 which was called for in connection with this case.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by order dated 25.05.2024, the petitioners, namely, 1. Shefali Khatun @ Shepali Khatun,
¶2Ahali Khatun @ Nur Begum and 3. Afruza Khatun @ Afruza Begum were granted interim bail with certain conditions. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioners has appeared before the Investigating Officer and have cooperated in the investigation.
¶3On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that from the case diary, it appears that the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer and their statement have been recorded by the Investigating Officer under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
¶4I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, and have perused the case diary of Mancachar PS Case No. 111/2024.
¶5In view of the fact that the petitioners have complied with the directions of this Court and have appeared before the Investigating Officer and there is nothing on record to indicate that they have violated any conditions Page No.# 3/3 imposed on them while granting interim bail to them, the interim bail granted to the above named petitioners by order dated 29.05.2024 by this Court is hereby made absolute with conditions Nos. 1, 2 and 3 attached to the said order remaining intact.
¶6With the above observation, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
¶7Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010105392024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/1376/2024o SHEFALIoKHATUNo@oSHEPALIoKHATUNoANDo2oORSo W/OoMUJIBURoRAHMAN,oR/OoVILL-oBHURAKATA,oP.O.- RADHAMADHABHAT,oP.S.-MANKACHAR,oDIST-SOUTHoSALMARA- MANKACHAR,oASSAM 2:oAHALIoKHATUNo@oNURoBEGUM oW/OoBULALoSK oR/OoVILL-oBHURAKATA oP.O.-RADHAMADHABHAT oP.S.-MANKACHAR oDIST-SOUTHoSALMARA-MANKACHAR oASSAM 3:oAFRUZAoKHATUNo@oAFRUZAoBEGUM oW/OoKALUoSKo@oABDURoRAHIMoBADSHA oR/OoVILL-oBHURAKATA oP.O.-RADHAMADHABHAT oP.S.-MANKACHAR oDIST-SOUTHoSALMARA-MANKACHAR oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oSoRAHMANo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.