- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 July 2024
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 1656/2024
Judgment
ORDER
31.07.2024
¶1Heard Mr. J. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S.N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. Mr. K.K. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2,3,4 and 6 as well as Mr. C. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 and Ms. S. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 7.
¶2This application under Order 22 Rule 4(4)read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the applicant for exemption to substitute the legal representatives of the proforma opposite party No. 8, namely, Paskuri Ranjan Dey and proforma opposite party No. 9, namely, Adaribala Das respectively. Page No.# 7/8
¶3The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the predecessor-in-interest of the present applicant preferred the connected second appeal, namely, i.e. RSA No. 199/2014, wherein substantial question(s) of law was formulated as well as notices was issued to the parties. However, during the pendency of the said second appeal, the predecessor-in-interest of the present applicant preferred, namely, Firoja Khatun expired and the appeal got abated. Now the present applicant, who are the legal representatives of the original second appellant have filed substitution petition which has been registered as Interlocutory Application No. 238/2023 in connection with RSA No. 199/2014. However, in preferring the Interlocutory Application also, there has been a delay and for condoning the delay the instant Interlocutory Application has been filed, wherein, all the other opposite parties except opposite party Nos. 8 and 9 have appeared.
¶4The notices were also duly served on opposite party Nos. 10 and 11, who failed to appear in spite of due service of notice on them.
¶5The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the opposite party Nos. 8 and 9,who were the defendant Nos. 8 and 9 respectively, in the Title Suit No. 07/09 failed to file any written statement against the plaint of the plaintiff in the said suit. However, they did file written statement against the counter-claim filed by the predecessor-in-interest of the present applicant, though the respondent Nos. 8 and 9 filed the written statement against the counter-claim, however, they failed to contest the said case and the case proceeded ex parte against them. Hence, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that under above circumstances, the provision of Order 22 Rule 4(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is applicable and therefore, he prays that the applicant may be exempted from substituting the legal representatives of Page No.# 8/8 opposite party Nos. 8 and 9 in this case.
¶6The learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and other respondents does not opposes the prayer of the applicant.
¶7On the basis of what has been narrated hereinbefore, it appears that the case of the applicant with regard to the applicability of Order 22 Rule 4(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, squarely, falls under the said provisions. Hence, this Court is of considered opinion that this is a fit case where the above-named applicant may be exempted from the necessity of substituting the legal representatives of respondent Nos. 8 and 9 in I.A. No. 235/2023.
¶8This Interlocutory Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/8 GAHC010106012024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1656/2024o ONoTHEoDEATHoOFoFIROJAoKHATUN,o HISoLEGALoHEIRS 1.1:oWAHIDoKHAN oS/OoLATEoSAHIDoKHANoANDoLATEoFIROJAoKHATUN oR/OoVILL.oJAGIROADoSILBHANGA oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782410 1.2:oYUSUFoKHAN oS/OoLATEoSAHIDoKHANoANDoLATEoFIROJAoKHATUN oR/OoVILL.oJAGIROADoSILBHANGA oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782410 1.3:oIMRANoKHAN oS/OoLATEoSAHIDoKHANoANDoLATEoFIROJAoKHATUN oR/OoVILL.oJAGIROADoSILBHANGA oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782410 1.4:oWAHIDAoBEGUM oD/OoLATEoSAHIDoKHANoANDoLATEoFIROJAoKHATUN oR/OoVILL.oJAGIROADoSILBHANGA oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo78241o PageoNo.#o2/8 VERSUSo RAJIAoBEGUMoando10oORSo W/OoMD.oALIoHUSSAIN,oVILL.oJAGIROADoSILBHANGA,oDIST.oMORIGAON,o ASSAM,oPINoCODEo782410 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPTD.oBYoCHIEFoSECY. oGOVT.oOFoASSAM oDISPUR oGUWAHATIo781006 3:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oMORIGAON oDIST.oMORIGAONoASSAM oPINoCODEo782105 4:THEoADDL.oDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oMORIGAON oP.O.oMORIGAON oDIST.oMORIGAONoASSAM oPINoCODEo782105 5:THEoNATIONALoHIGHWAYoAUTHORITYoOFoINDIA oUNDERoMINISTRYoOFoSHIPPINGo oROADoTRANSPORToANDoHIGHWAYSoGOVT.oOFoINDIA oPROJECToIMPLEMENTATIONoUNIT oNAGAON oHAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToSANKARoMISSIONoROAD oDIST.oNAGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782001 6:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICERoOFoMAYONGoREVENUEoCIRCLE oJUGIoBHAKATGAON oMOUZAoMANAHA oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782411 7:THEoASSTT.oEXECUTIVEoENGINEER Page No.# 3/8 P.W.D. BUILDING DIVISION MORIGAON P.S.MORIGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782105 8:PASKURI RANJAN DEY S/O MAHENDRA DEY VILL. NAKHULA GRANT JAGIROAD REVENUE TOWN DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782410 9:SMTI ADARIBALA DAS W/O PRIYALAL DAS VILL. NAKHULA GRANT JAGIROAD REVENUE TOWN P.O. and P.S. JAGIROAD DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782410 10:SMTI JHARNA RANI PAUL W/O SRI RATAN PAUL VILL. NAKHULA GRANT JAGIROAD REVENUE TOWN P.O. and P.S. JAGIROAD DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782410 11:MANIK CH. DEY S/O LATE BIRENDRA DEY VILL. NAKHULA GRANT JAGIROAD REVENUE TOWN P.O. and P.S. JAGIROAD DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 78241 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K DEKA,MR. T K BHUYAN,MR. J DEKA,MR. S SARMA Page No.# 4/8 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, NHAI,MD. M H CHOUDHURY,SC, PWD (R - 1) In RSA/199/2014 FIROJA KHATUN W/O MD. SAHED ALI VILL. JAGIROAD SILBHANGA P.S. JAGIROAD MOUZA -GOVA DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM. VERSUS RAJIA BEGUM and 10 ORS. W/O MD. ALI HUSSAIN VILL. JAGIROAD SILBHANGA DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782410 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPTD. BY CHIEF SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782105 4:THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MORIGAON P.O. MORIGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782105 5:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA PageoNo.#o5/8 UNDERoMINISTRYoOFoSHIPPINGo oROADoTRANSPORToANDoHIGHWAYSoGOVT.oOFoINDIA oPROJECToIMPLEMENTATIONoUNIT oNAGAON oHAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToSANKARoMISSIONoROAD oDIST.oNAGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782001 o6:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICERoOFoMAYONGoREVENUEoCIRCLE JUGIoBHAKATGAON oMOUZAoMANAHA oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782411 o7:THEoASSTT.oEXECUTIVEoENGINEER P.W.D.oBUILDINGoDIVISION oMORIGAON oP.S.MORIGAON oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782105 o8:PASKURIoRANJANoDEY S/OoMAHENDRAoDEY oVILL.oNAKHULAoGRANT oJAGIROADoREVENUEoTOWN oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782410 o9:SMTIoADARIBALAoDAS W/OoPRIYALALoDAS oVILL.oNAKHULAoGRANT oJAGIROADoREVENUEoTOWN oP.O.oandoP.S.oJAGIROAD oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAM oPINoCODEo782410 o10:SMTIoJHARNAoRANIoPAUL W/OoSRIoRATANoPAUL Page No.# 6/8 VILL. NAKHULA GRANT JAGIROAD REVENUE TOWN P.O. and P.S. JAGIROAD DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782410 11:MANIK CH. DEY S/O LATE BIRENDRA DEY VILL. NAKHULA GRANT JAGIROAD REVENUE TOWN P.O. and P.S. JAGIROAD DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE 782410 ------------ Advocate for : MR.B ISLAM Advocate for : MS. L N CHOUDHURY appearing for RAJIA BEGUM
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.