- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1538/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15 .07. 2024 Heard Mr. R.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioner, namely Rakibul Hoque @ Rakhibul Islam praying for regular bail, who was arrested on 14.04.2024 in connection with Bilasipara P.S. Case No. 91/2024 under Sections 376(D) IPC read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Page No.# 2/2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been detained in custody since 14.04.2024 for last 93 days and hence considering the length of detention, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. In this context, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that he has made an enquiry in the case diary and found that the I.O. has not submitted charge sheet even after the lapse of statutory period of detention. In view of the above and considering the period of detention and considering the fact that the I.O. has not submitted charge sheet against the accused/ petitioner even after completion of statutory period, it is directed that the accused/ petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with 1 (one) suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bilasipara in connection with the aforementioned case. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner:
(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bilasipara, without prior written permission from him/ her;
(b) shall not hamper in the investigation of the case and tamper with the evidence of the case; and
(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. `
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010106892024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1538/2024 RAKIBUL HOQUE @ RAKHIBUL ISLAM S/O EYANUDDIN SK. VILL- BARSHI PT.I P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:JOHURUL HOQUE S/OLT. ANUDDIN SK. VILL- BARSHI PT.I P.S. BILASIPARA DSIT. DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.