VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md Jarif Ali v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 May 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1568/2024

Judgment

ORDER

31.05.2024 Heard Ms P Boruah, learned counsel for the petitioner, Md Jarif Ali.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 CrPC, with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 27.04.2024, in connection with Tezpur PS Case No. 214/2024, registered under Sections 353/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶3Heard Ms A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3

¶4I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶5The allegation against the petitioner is that a naka checking was held on a tip-off received by the investigating team, when the petitioner who was a suspect, relating to the naka checking, with the allegation of carrying drugs was stopped. The petitioner tried to escape and with an intention to kill the informant, the petitioner fled past on his bike. The informant then sustained injuries on his waist as he was hit by the handle of the bike driven by the petitioner.

¶6The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection.

¶7I have considered the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been behind bars since 34 days.

¶8It appears that investigation may have progressed to some extent. The petitioner was immediately arrested on the day of the incident. The petitioner has pledged to co-operate with the remaining part of the investigation.

¶9The petitioner being a local resident is not a flight risk.

¶9Investigation may have presumably progressed to some extent.

¶10In view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/-, with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Sonitpur, under the conditions that-

i) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged, and Page No.# 3/3

ii) the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶12Bail Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010107312024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1568/2024 MD JARIF ALI S/O MAZIBUR RAHMAN, VILL- BHITORSUTI, P.S.-TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN-784001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.