Shoriful Islam v. The Divisional Manager and 2 Ors

ORDER Date : 03.01.2024 Heard Mr. H.Das, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. D. Deka, learned counsel for opposite party No.1. Also heard Mr. B.Barman, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3. By this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 19 days in preferring the connected MAC appeal against the Judgment and Order, dated

10.01.2023 in MAC Case No.447/2019 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Goalpara. The learned counsel for the opposite party has no objection to the prayer of the applicant. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the grounds cited in the instant application particularly the averments made in paragraphs Nos. 4 and 5, this court finds satisfactory grounds for condoning the delay of 19 days in preferring the connected MAC Appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 19 days in preferring the connected MAC Appeal is hereby condoned. The interlocutory application is disposed of. Registry to register the connected MAC Appeal and list the same for admission. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010109012023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1394/2023 SHORIFUL ISLAM S/O ABDUL HAKIM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 2 TUPAMARI, PO BADLA BAZAR, PS NAGAR BERA, DIST KAMRUP , ASASM VERSUS THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND 2 ORS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ULUBARI, GUWAHATI 7 2:BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER VALLEY PVT. LTD. 7204 PEACE ENCLAVE 3RD FLOOR BLOCK 3 E ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7 3:GAUTAM BORO S/O CHABIN BORO VILLAGE SANTIPUR PO TOPATALI PS KHETRI DIST KAMRUP ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H DAS Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B BARMAN (R-3,2) Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI