- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 2 June 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1585/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 03-06-2024
Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner Bipul Ghosh.
¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as he is behind bars since 18.05.2023 in connection Page No.# 2/3 with Tezpur Police Station Case No. 271/2024 under Sections 447/427/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
¶3Heard Ms. S. Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.
¶4I have considered the submissions at the bar and I have perused the FIR.
¶5The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused named in the FIR demolished the house belonging to the informant which resulted in loss of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs). When the informant tried to resist, the petitioner instructed the driver to kill the informant.
¶6The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection stating that the house was ransacked and demolished by the accused persons.
¶7I have considered the submission on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been behind bars since 18.05.2024. The petitioner is a local resident and he is willing to cooperate with the remaining part of investigation. It appears that further custodial detention may not be required for the progress of investigation.
¶8Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed.
¶9The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonitpur under the conditions that:
(i) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged. Page No.# 3/3
(ii) The petitioner shall not exercise threats to the witnesses.
(iii) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission till completion of investigation.
¶10On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.
¶11In the above terms and conditions, this Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010109512024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1585/2024 BIPUL GHOSH S/O SRI MANORANJAN GHOSH R/O ULIAMGURI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM PIN-784001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.