VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mahibur Islam Pramanik @ Majibur Ali v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
11 June 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1610/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 12-06-2024

Heard Mr. M. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner Mahibur Islam Pramanik @ Majibur Ali.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Page No.# 2/3 Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC for short) with a prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 20.05.2024 in connection with Bongaigaon GRPS Case No. 33/2024 under Sections 328/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶3Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.

¶4The allegation against the petitioner is that he and his companions administered biscuits mixed with intoxicating drugs to the complainant/passenger and robbed him of Rs.400/- (Rupees Four Hundred) and Rs.300/- (Rupees Three Hundred) from his friend along with 2 (Two) mobile phones and sim cards. An FIR was lodged and investigation commenced. During investigation, the petitioner was apprehended and forwarded to custody.

¶5The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner.

¶6I have scrutinized the Case Diary.

¶7Indeed there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner. Investigation has progressed to a considerable extent. The petitioner is willing to cooperate with the remaining part of investigation. The petitioner has pledged to abide by any stringent conditions if imposed upon him.

¶8Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed.

¶9The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned Eleka Magistrate under the conditions that:

(i) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged. Page No.# 3/3

(ii) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission till completion of investigation.

¶10On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶11In the above terms this Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶12Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010110532024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1610/2024 MAHIBUR ISLAM PRAMANIK @ MAJIBUR ALI S/O MAYDAN ALI PRAMANIK VILL- KHARMUZA P.S. GOALPARA DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.