VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Giridhar Das and 2 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
4 August 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 1695/2024

Judgment

ORDER

05.08.2024 Heard Ms. A. Biyani, learned counsel for the applicant. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is preferred by the applicant United India Insurance Co. Ltd., for condonation of delay of 1(one) day in preferring connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 19.07.2023, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup(M), in MAC Case No.67/2016. Ms. Biyani, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a Public Sector Undertaking and in the process of routing the file, delay had occurred and the same is not intentional, rather it is circumstantial and she has explained the reason of delay in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of this application. Having heard the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, specially the statement/averments made in para Nos.4, 5 and 6 of the application, this Court finds that the delay of 1(one) day is sufficiently explained and therefore, this Court is inclined to condone the same, without issuing notice to the respondents. Accordingly, The delay of 1(one) day in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned. In terms of above, the I.A. stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 Registry to register and number the connected appeal and list the same before this Court. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010111172024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1695/2024o UNITEDoINDIAoINSURANCEoCOoLTDo HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoATo24,oWHITESoROAD,oCHENNAI,oTAMILo NADUoANDoONEoOFoTHEoREGIONALoOFFICEoAToCHRISTIANoBASTI,oG.S.o ROAD,oGUWAHATI-o07. VERSUSo GIRIDHARoDASoANDo2oORS.o S/OoLATEoRUPGHARoDAS,o R/OoKUKURMARA,o3oNO.oANTOLA,oP.O.-oKUKURMARA,oP.S.-oCHHAYGAON,o KAMRUPo(R),oASSAM,oPIN-o781124. 2:DEBARAJoADHIKARI oS/OoLATEoMUNINDRAoADHIKARI o VILL.-oKAWOIMARI oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oCHHAYGAON oKAMRUPo(R) oASSAM oPIN-o781124. 3:SARUoMOHANoKALITA oS/OoSUKLESWARoKALITA o VILL.-oALEGJARI oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oCHHAYGAON oKAMRUPo(R) oASSAM oPIN-o781124o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oRoKoBHATRA,oNoDKHAR,MR.oAoSAIKIA,MSoPoHUJURIo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.