- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1794/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 16.07.2024
Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. A.K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/informant. Page No.# 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh. Mr. Goswami, learned Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the informant/respondent No.2 have no objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010111522024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1794/2024 HARISH BANSAL S/O SRI TEJ PAL BANSAL R/O W-10-C, WESTERN AVENUE, SAINIK FARM, P.S. NEB SARAI NEW DELHI- 110062 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHAUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.