- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 1 February 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- Crl.Rev.P. 229/2023
Judgment
ORDER
02.02.2024 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P, Assam. This is an application under Section 397 of Cr.PC, 1973 read with Sections Page No.# 2/2 401 & 482 of Cr.PC seeking quashing of the Order dated 21.02.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge (Addl.), Dhubri in Misc. Case No. 04/2023, whereby the petition of the petitioner, i.e., Petition No. 3903 (Misc. Case No. 4/23) filed under Section 451 of Cr.PC seeking Zimma of seized vehicle (Scooty) was rejected. It is submitted at the bar that in the meantime, Charge-sheet has been submitted. In view of the fact that Charge-sheet has already been submitted, this Court deems appropriate to direct the petitioner to approach before the Trial Court (Special Judge (Addl.), Dhubri) by way of filing an appropriate application. Upon such application filed, the Trial Court shall consider it in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010112372023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./229/2023 BADSHAH SK @ BADSHAH LENGRA S/O TARACHAN ALI SK R/O VIL- BOGULAMARI P.S. DHUBRI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.