- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 June 2023
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- AB 1859/2023
Judgment
ORDER 30-06-2023 Heard Ms. J. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State assisted by Mr. A. Mobaraque, learned counsel for the informant. By this application under Section 438 CrPC, the petitioners, namely, 1) Jakir Hussain, 2) Mir Hussain @ Mir Hussain Ali, 3) Sakkir Ali @ Chakir Huchen and 4) Umar Ali apprehending their arrest are seeking pre arrest bail in Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023 registered under Sections 461/325/326/392/34 IPC corresponding to G.R. No. 526/2023. As per the FIR of the case, the petitioners obstructed one Ramjan Ali while he was going to Mosque for Namaz and the accused petitioners named in the FIR abused him with foul language. Later in the evening on the date of the incident, while one Mostahidur Rahman was looking after his accounts in his shop, the accused persons went inside his shop and assaulted him with sharp weapons like dao, Javelin and rod and searched for Ramjan Ali and the accused persons attacked said Mostahidur Rahman, who somehow managed to fled from his shop and the accused persons ransacked his shop and looted away Rs.20,000/- and later chased few other persons including Ramjan Ali. The same was registered as Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023. The injured persons were referred to Gauhati Medical College and Hospital for better treatment. Page No.# 3/4
It is seen that prior to the said incident one Mir Hussain
@ Babu lodged an FIR with regard to an incident against the husband of the complainant and other persons which was registered as Rangia P.S. Case No.289/2023 corresponding to G.R. No.527/2023. Perused both the case diaries of Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023 as well as Rangia P.S. Case No.289/2023. From both the case diaries, it is seen that on the evening of 17.05.2023 the accused persons Mir Hussain Ali, Zakir Hussain Rejek Ali and Saifudding misbehaved with Ramjan Ali and in the evening those accused persons assaulted Ramjan Ali, Zakir Hussain and others. On the other hand, case diaries reveal that there was a commotion with one Mir Hussain and thereafter, the petitioners went to the house of Mir Hussain and threatened him and partially destroyed the walls of his house. The note of the I/O discloses that there was no such fight took place between the parties and both the parties filed their individual FIRs in the matter. Considering such materials in both the case diaries, the Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not warranted to investigate said Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023. As such, this pre-arrest bail application of the petitioners is accepted. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely, 1) Jakir Hussain, 2) Mir Hussain @ Mir Hussain Ali, 3) Sakkir Ali @ Chakir Huchen and 4) Umar Ali, they shall be released on bail in said Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.75,000/-, each with 2 (two) local sureties each, of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on conditions that the petitioners shall –
(i) appear before the Investigating Officer of said Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023 on or before 06.07.2023 and thereafter, on every Thursday during the office hours between 10:00 am to 1:00 pm for the next 10 (ten) weeks commencing from
13.07.2023 and thereafter, as and when they are required for necessary investigation of the case and on their such appearance, the I/O of said Rangia P.S. Case shall record the statements of the petitioners; (ii) not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the Rangia Police Station, without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer Page No.# 4/4 of the case; (iii) not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case and (iv) they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer, failing which, the bail granted to them in the aforesaid Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023 shall stand automatically vacated. Further, the petitioners shall not indulge in similar offence or any other criminal offences in future, failing which, the bail granted to them in said Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023 shall stand automatically vacated. Any violation of the aforesaid terms and conditions by any of the petitioners, named above, the pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioners in said Rangia P.S. Case No. 288/2023 shall stand automatically vacated. Return the case diary. This pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of to the extent above.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010113742023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/1859/2023 JAKIRoHUSSAINoANDo3oORS S/OoISMAILoALIo R/OoVILL-oRANGIA WARDoNO.o10o P.O.oANDoP.S.oRANGIA oDIST.oKAMRUP oASSAM 2:oMIRoHUSSAINo@oMIRoHUSSAINoALI S/OoISMAILoALIo R/OoVILL-oRANGIA WARDoNO.o10o P.O.oANDoP.S.oRANGIA oDIST.oKAMRUP oASSAM o3:oSAKKIRoALIo@oCHAKIRoHUCHEN S/OoISMAILoALIo R/OoVILL-oRANGIA WARDoNO.o10o P.O.oANDoP.S.oRANGIA oDIST.oKAMRUP oASSAM o4:oUMARoALI S/OoLT.MAIJUDDINoALIo R/OoVILL-oRANGIA WARDoNO.o10o P.O.oANDoP.S.oRANGIA oDIST.oKAMRUP oASSAM oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM Page No.# 2/4 REP. BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MS. J PAUL Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.