- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 21 October 2024
- Bench
- Suman Shyam
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C) 304/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 22-10-2024 Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. P. Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court has been complied with for all technical purposes. However, Mr. Choudhury submits that grievance of his client, if any, Page No.# 2/2 can be agitated in a fresh writ petition. Therefore, the learned Sr. counsel submits that this contempt case be closed with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available under the law. Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent is present and does not have any objection to the said submission of the petitioner's counsel. In view of the above, this contempt case stands closed with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE GS
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010114472024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/304/2024 JAYANTA KUMAR SARMA S/O- LATE DEBENDRANATH SARMA, R/O-C/4, GIRI NIWAS, KHARGHULI, P.O- UZANBAZAR, P.S- LATASIL, DIST- KAMRUP (M), PIN-781004, ASSAM, VERSUS DR. PRANJIT BORA REGISTRAR KKHSOU, PATGAON, RANI GUWAHATI-17, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : PLABAN BHARADWAJ, MR. D BORA,MR. M K CHOUDHURY,MR. M SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P J PHUKAN, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.