- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 1507/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15-07-2024 Heard Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner Rintu Miah @ Rintu Sk., who has filed this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC for short) with prayer for pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 1365/2023 arising out of Mankachar Police Station Case No. 317/2020 (GR No. 420/2020) under Sections Page No.# 2/2 364 (A)/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
¶2Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.
¶3It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is willing to cooperate with the trial.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the petitioner is the main accused in this case. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection against the bail petition under Section 438 of the CrPC.
¶5I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. I have also taken a pragmatic view. The petitioner is willing to cooperate with the trial. The petitioner is hereby directed to appear before the jurisdictional Court within 20 (Twenty) days and apply for bail which may be considered by the Court in accordance with law.
¶6In the above terms this Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010114912024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1507/2024 RINTU MIAH @ RINTU SK S/O NUR BOKTA SK, VILL- SONAPUR, P.O.-PURANDIARA, DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783135 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.