- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 19 June 2023
- Bench
- Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1878/2023
Judgment
ORDER
19.06.2023 Heard Mr A K Azad, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Also perused the Case Diary. Page No.# 2/3
¶2The petitioner, Biki Das, who is in jail since 02.04.2023, has preferred this application under Section 439 CrPC, seeking bail in connection with Paltanbazar PS Case No. 135/2023, under Sections 376(3)/511 IPC, read with Section 8/18 of the POCSO Act and read with Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the accused petitioner has been languishing in jail hazot since 02.04.2023 and has completed 78 days in jail hazot. So, he has prayed that considering the period of detention, the petitioner may be released on bail.
¶4On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is the father of the victim. On perusal of the Case diary, it reveals that the victim had love relationship with some other boy and the petitioner who is the father of the victim obstructed her to do so, for which, the victim had lodged FIR against her father.
¶5I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the parties. I have also perused the Case Diary, along with the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 CrPC, which reveals that on 27.03.2023, when the victim went to one of her friend's house, her father, i.e., the petitioner lodged a missing complaint of the victim before the Police, whereafter, the victim had made allegations against the petitioner.
¶5In view of the above and considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the parties, this bail application is allowed. Accordingly, it is hereby directed that the petitioner, namely, Biki Das, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Kamrup (Metro), Guwhahati, in connection with the aforesaid case. The bail granted to the petitioner shall be subject to following conditions:-
(a) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge (POCSO), Kamrup (Metro), without prior written permission from him;
(b) The petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case; Page No.# 3/3
(c) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
¶7With the aforesaid directions, this Bail Application stands disposed of.
¶8Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010116182023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1878/2023 BIKI DAS S/O LATE UMESH DAS R/O LACHIT NAGAR, RAJGARH ROAD, P.S. PALTAN BAZAR, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K AZAD Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.