VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Satyajit Boruah and Anr v. The Union of India and 4 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
2 June 2023
Bench
Suman Shyamauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 3169/2023

Judgment

ORDER

02.06.2023

Heard Mr. S. Sutradhar, learned counsel for the writ petitioners. Also heard Ms. B. Sarmah, learned CGC, appearing for the respondents. The two petitioners herein belong to the OBC category. In response to the advertisement notice dated 21-07-2018 for recruitment in the post of Constable (General Duty) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), the petitioners had submitted their Page No.# 3/4 candidatures and had also participated in the selection process. However, on conclusion of the process, the petitioners were not selected. The basis for not doing so is on account of the fact that the marks obtained by the petitioners was considered along with the other candidates belong to the OBC category and it was observed that since the petitioners had availed the relaxation for chest and height measurement prescribed for the candidates coming from Assam, they could not be considered along with the general category candidates. However, the fact remains that the petitioners had scored more marks than some of the general category candidates, who were ultimately selected and appointed by the authorities. Similarly situated petitioners had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 3764/2021 raising a similar grievance. After taking note of the facts of the case as well as the law laid down by the Delhi High Court in Hemant Pokhriyal Vs. SSC & Ors. [WP(C) 4982/2021 decided on 01-10-2021] and also the decision rendered in the case of Arpan Chowdhury Vs. UoI & Ors. rendered by the Tripura High Court in connection with W.P.(C) No. 117/2021, the learned Single Judge was of the opinion that the petitioners were entitled to receive orders of appointment. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of with a direction upon the respondents to accommodate those petitioners in any of the CAPFs, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. By referring to the order dated 11-08-2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 3764/2021, Mr. Sutradhar submits that this is a covered case and, therefore, be disposed of with a similar direction. Ms. Sarmah, learned CGC, in her usual fairness, has conceded that the petitioners' case would be covered by the previous decision of this Court but submits that since in the meantime, all the vacant posts of Constable (GD) in the CAPFs coming under the advertisement notice dated 21-07-2018 have already been filled up, the petitioners may be accommodated in any other Armed Police Force. Mr. Sutradhar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his clients would Page No.# 4/4 have no objection if such a recourse is taken as long as they are issued with the orders of appointment without further delay. Taking note of the submission advanced by learned counsel for both the sides, this writ petition is hereby disposed of by providing that the respondents may issue orders of appointment to the petitioners appointing them as Constable (GD) in any of the division of the Central Armed Police Forces or in any other Armed Police Force, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 6 (six) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010117622023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3169/2023o SATYAJIToBORUAHoANDoANRo SONoOFoMANIKoBORUAH,o R/O-oVILL-oKHERJAN,o P.O.-oKAKOPATHAR,o PS-oKAKOPATHAR,o DIST.-oTINSUKIA,o ASSAM,oPIN-o786152. 2:oUTTAMoCHOUHAN oSONoOFoRAMoPROBESHoCHOUHAN o R/OoVILL.oNO.o3oCHIKAJHORA o P.O.oANDoP.S.oBIJNI o DIST.-oCHIRANG oASSAM o PIN-o783390o VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo4oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoINDIA,o MINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,o NEWoDELHI,oPINo-110001. 2:THEoUNIONoOFoINDIA oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoINDIA o MINISTRYoOFoPERSONNELoPUBLICoGRIEVANCESoANDoPENSIONS o NEWoBLOCK oNEWoDELHI Page No.# 2/4 PIN- 110001. 3:THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN BLOCK NO. 12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI- 110003. 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110066. 5:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION REGIONAL OFFICE HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SUTRADHAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.